EDP Sciences logo
Submit a paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 8 (2021) EPJ Appl. Metamat., 8 (2021) 12 Full HTML
Issue
EPJ Appl. Metamat.
Volume 8, 2021
Metamaterial Research Updates from China
Article Number 12
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/epjam/2021004
Published online 20 April 2021

© Y.-J. Yang et al., Published by EDP Sciences, 2021

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The pattern reconfigurable antenna has been widely exploited because it not only improves the system capacity and anti-interference ability, but also reduces the physical volume and system complexity. Phased array antenna is the traditional method to implement this technology, however, the complex feed networks make the antenna system bulky and expensive [1–3]. Frequency selective surface (FSS) is a periodic structure capable of transmitting or reflecting EM waves at resonance [4]. In recent years, active frequency selective surfaces [5] have been widely used in the beam steering antennas [6,7]. However, since most of the tunable components has problems to be used in the terahertz frequency ranges, many new materials [8] and technologies are applied to THz beam scanning antennas [9–12].

As a two-dimensional carbon material [13], graphene has the unique property that its complex surface conductivity depends on the carrier density and can be controlled by gate voltage [14], which makes it a novel tunable material suitable for the reconfigurable device design. Therefore, many graphene-based tunable THz devices such as active frequency selective surface (AFSS) [15], modulator [16], sensor [17,18], polarization selective surfaces [19], tunable absorber [20–23] and reconfigurable antenna [24,25] have been proposed. In the previous work, we have demonstrated a large angle beam steering THz antenna using active frequency selective surface based on hybrid graphene-gold structure [26].

However, most of the traditional AFSS-based pattern reconfigurable antennas can only dynamically change the radiation pattern in a single band. In the multifunctional THz communication system, the dual-frequency beam steering antenna becomes important. Recently, some dual-band beam sweeping antennas in gigahertz [6,7] are proposed, but it utilizes band-stop FSS or cannot control independently, which is not suitable for practical application. Until now, as far as we know, it is still a challenge to achieve dual-band independently controllable pattern reconfigurable antennas in the terahertz regime.

In this paper, we present a dual-band beam steering THz antenna with flexible beam radiations using graphene-based AFSS. The antenna consists of a broadband monopole terahertz source antenna placed in the center of a hexagonal switchable AFSS screen. By changing the bias voltages of different parts of the hexagon AFSS screen, both beam steering and omnidirectional radiation patterns could be obtained to cover the entire azimuth plane of the antenna at both frequencies.

The geometry of the proposed dual-band switchable AFSS unit cell is shown in Figure 1a. Each AFSS unit cell consists of four layers: gold pattern layer, p-type doped silicon layer, silicon dioxide layer and graphene pattern layer. The silicon dioxide layer is chosen as insulating layer between p-type silicon and the graphene patches. The relative dielectric constant of p-type silicon and silicon dioxide is 11.7 and 4, respectively. As shown in Figure 1b, the designed FSS based on the cross-shaped slot in the center and the quarter folded slot rings in the four corners produces two different resonances. The cross-shaped slot is adopted here due to its simple structure and stable characteristic. To achieve separate feeding of different graphene patches, we propose a new graphene loading method as shown in Figure 1c, the square graphene patch is loaded under the cross-shaped slot, and quarter cross-shaped graphene patches are loaded under the quarter folded slot rings, respectively. Two kinds of bias voltages are applied between the gold pattern layer (DC connected with the p-type silicon layer) and the graphene pattern layer, thus controlling the chemical potentials as well as the surface conductivities of graphene patches. By tuning the two bias voltages separately on the two shapes of graphene patches, the transmission and reflection characteristics of the two passbands can be adjusted independently.

The complex surface conductivity σ (ω, μc, Γ, T) of monolayer graphene can be derived from the Kubo formula which includes interband and intraband contributions [27,28](1) (2)where ω is the operating angular frequency, μc is chemical potential, e is the charge of an electron, kB is the Boltzmann constant, ℏ is the reduced Planck constant, Γ = 1/(2τ) represents the scattering rate and τ is the relaxation time, T is the temperature in Kelvin. Based on a theoretical estimation of the maximum mobility in graphene, we assume T = 300 K and τ = 100 fs [29]. The chemical potential μc can be tuned by applying a transverse electric field via a DC biased gating structure [30], it can be approximately expressed as(3)where ϵr and ϵ0 are the permittivity of substrates and vacuum respectively, Vdc is the bias voltage, vf = 1.1 × 106 m/s is the Fermi velocity in graphene. According to formula (3), it can be calculated that the voltage required to adjust the graphene chemical potential from 0 to 0.5 eV is 50 V. This has been proven achievable in previous research [31].

The AFSS is a periodic structure which can be analyzed by the EM simulation softwave ANSYS HFSS. The graphene patches can be modeled as the impedance boundary with the complex impedance as Zs = 1/σ. Figure 2 shows the current distributions at f1 = 0.96 THz and f2 = 1.21 THz under different chemical potentials. It can be seen from Figure 2a that when μc1 = 0 eV, μc2 = 0.5 eV, f1 is generated by the resonance of quarter folded slot rings with strong current density at the four corners and the resonance at f2 is significantly reduced due to the loss of graphene. As shown in Figure 2b, when μc1 = 0.5 eV, μc2 = 0 eV, f2 is generated by the resonance of cross-shaped slot with large current density at the slot end and the resonance at f1 is significantly reduced due to the loss of quarter cross-shaped graphene patches. There is almost no interaction between the two frequencies.

The voltages Vg1 and Vg2 control the chemical potentials μc1 of the cross-shaped graphene patch and μc2 of the square graphene patch, respectively. Figure 3a shows the simulated transmission coefficient with μc1 changes from 0 to 0.5 eV and μc2 keeps 0 eV, while Figure 3b shows the simulated transmission coefficient as μc1 remains 0 eV and μc2 varies from 0 to 0.5 eV. It can be seen that μc1 controls the transmission amplitude at f1 = 0.96 THz while μc2 dynamically tunes the transmission amplitude at f2 = 1.21 THz. In this way, the proposed AFSS can achieve the conversion between high transmission (ON state) and large reflection (OFF state) at two frequency bands independently. For simplicity, here we use the 2-bit code with the first code to represent the state of f1 and the second code to represent the state of f2, 0 for the ON state and 1 for the OFF state. Figure 3c and d show the reflection and transmission coefficients in the four coded states of 00, 01, 10 and 11, respectively. In the “00” state, the transmission coefficient is −1.5 dB at 0.96 THz and −1.3 dB at 1.21 THz, indicating high transmission (ON) states appear in two bands. In the “01” state, the transmission state at 0.96 THz is basically unchanged, while the transmission coefficient is −10.8 dB at 1.21 THz, which means the second band switches to OFF state. In the “10” state, the first band switches to OFF state while the second band remains ON state. In the “11” state, both bands switch to OFF states. The robustness of changing the incident angle of the incidence plane wave under TE polarization is studied. As shown in Figure 3e and f, the two transmission bands remain stable with the increased incident angle.

As shown in Figure 4a, a broadband omnidirectional monopole antenna is designed as a radiating source and surrounded by a hexagonal AFSS screen. Each side of the hexagonal AFSS screen is composed of a 2 × 4 AFSS array with the unit cell structure described above. And the gold line structure is designed to apply DC voltage. Figure 4b shows the structure of the broadband monopole source antenna, which is composed of an inverted trapezoid element as a main resonator and a small ground plane on the bottom of the substrate. This monopole antenna is constructed on Rogers RO4350B substrate with a relative dielectric constant of 3.66. It is selected here for its simple structure and ability to provide an omnidirectional radiation pattern in the azimuth plane at both 0.96 and 1.21 THz, as shown in Figure 4d. As shown in Figure 4c, this monopole antenna has a wide bandwidth covering 0.9–1.4 THz. After adding a hexagonal AFSS screen with filtering characteristics, and by controlling the four coded states of AFSS, four corresponding antenna states can be obtained. In the “00” state, two narrow operating bands are obtained. In the “01” state, the first band remains operating and the second band switches OFF state. In the “10” state, the first band switches OFF state and the second band remains operating. In the “11” state, both bands switch to OFF states.

As illustrated in Figure 5, four typical operating states are analyzed in order to verify the proposed THz antenna can realize beam sweeping at two frequencies independently. For the convenience of explanation, AFSS in each side is abstracted to black border rectangles numbered 1–6 represent the cross-shaped graphene patch operating at 0.96 THz and red border rectangles numbered 7–12 represent the square graphene patch works at 1.21 THz. The yellow color means ON state and blue color indicates OFF state, which can be adjusted by the bias voltages of each side independently. The feeding method of each face is shown in Figure 4a.

Case I: As shown in Figure 5a, for the cross-shaped graphene patches numbered 1–6, three adjacent sides are switched to OFF state at 0.96 THz, and the others are switched to ON state. For the rectangular graphene patches numbered 7–12, all sides of the AFSS are switched to ON state at 1.21 THz. As shown in Figure 5e and f, the radiation pattern has the ability to scan the entire azimuth plane in six steps at 0.96 THz. Meanwhile, it remain omnidirectional as the monopole antenna at 1.21 THz.

Case II: As shown in Figure 5b, for the cross-shaped graphene patches of 1–6, all sides of the AFSS are switched to ON state at 0.96 THz. For the square graphene patches numbered 7–12, three adjacent sides are switched to OFF state at 1.21 THz, and the others are switched to ON state. The radiation patterns at 1.21 THz realize 360° beam steering in six steps as shown in Figure 5h. Figure 5g shows the stable omnidirectional radiation patterns at 0.96 THz.

Case III: As shown in Figure 5c, for both the graphene patches 1–6 and 7–12, three adjacent sides are switched to OFF state and the others are switched to ON state. The radiation patterns shown in Figure 5i has the ability to scan the entire azimuth plane in six steps at both 0.96 and 1.21 THz simultaneously.

Case IV: As shown in Figure 5d, for both the graphene patches numbered 1–6 and 7–12, the OFF state of the AFSS on each side is different between every two adjacent faces. For example, when the number 2-4-6 and 7-9-11 are on OFF state, and the number 1-3-5 and 8-10-12 are switched to ON state, the antenna can radiate in three different directions as shown in Figure 5j at two frequencies simultaneously.

An open question that remains to be answered is the practical realization of the structures we propose here. Fortunately, recent advances in the fabrication of graphene [32–34] let us be optimistic about the feasibility of such structures in the near future. Additionally, biasing graphene seems difficult in practice. One can use self-biased graphene layers [35] connected to opposite poles of a voltage source. Finally, if bias voltage should be avoided, graphene layers can be excited optically [36,37].

In conclusion, a dual-band beam sweeping THz antenna is achieved by loading a hexagonal AFSS screen around a broadband omnidirectional monopole antenna. The graphene-based AFSS unit cell consists of aperture-type frequency selective surface loading graphene patches. By applying bias voltages separately to the two kinds of graphene patches, the transmission property in the two bands can be adjusted independently. Four typical cases of the antenna with six sides of the AFSS screen operating at ON/OFF state in two bands are demonstrated to validate the antenna can achieve beam sweeping in the entire azimuth plane with six steps and omnidirectional pattern at 0.96 and 1.21 THz simultaneously. This multifunctional THz antenna is promising for large angle beam scanning in terahertz multiband systems.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61771360, U19A2055, 62071357), the key Industry chain Project of Shaanxi Province (Grant No. 2018ZDCXL-GY-08-03-01), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the Innovation Fund of Xidian University.

References

  1. V.S. Rao, V.V. Srinivasan, S. Pal, Electron. Lett. 45, 441 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  2. W. Zhou, M. Stead, S. Weiss et al., Appl. Opt. 56, B5 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Tatoli, D. Conteduca et al., Appl. Opt. 55, 4342 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  4. T.K. Wu, Frequency Selective Surface and Grid Array (Wiley, New York, 1995) [Google Scholar]
  5. P.S. Taylor, E.A. Parker, J.C. Batchelor, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 59, 3265 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Li, Q. Zeng, R. Liu, T.A. Denidni, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65, 1542 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Gu, B.S. Izquierdo, S. Gao, J.C. Batchelor, E.A. Parker et al., IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65, 1393 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Ozaki, K. Kihara, K. Matsuura, K. Kadowaki, T.Q. Duong, H. Moritake, Appl. Phys. Express 13, 051003 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  9. T.P. Steinbusch, H.K. Tyagi, M.C. Schaafsma, G. Georgiou, J.G. Rivas, Opt. Express 22, 26559 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Orazbayev, M. Beruete, I. Khromova, Opt. Express 24, 8848 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  11. B. Ratni, J. Yi, X. Ding, A. Lustrac et al., Opt. Express 26, 6724 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Kim, M. Kim, Opt. Express 28, 16822 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. A.K. Geim, Science 324, 1530 (2009) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Vakil, N. Engheta, Science 332, 1291 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Zhang, Y. Feng, B. Zhu et al., Opt. Express 22, 22743 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Huang, W. Lu, Z. Liu, S. Gao, Opt. Express 26, 7358 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Wang, Z. Ren, D. Kong, H. Wu, B. Hu, Z. He, Appl. Phys. Express 13, 067001 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  18. Y.P. Gu, X.T. Pu, H. Zhong, J. Chen, C.J. Tang, Z. Yu, Appl. Phys. Express 13, 022013 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Li, J. Zhao, H. Lin, W. Milne, Y. Hao, Opt. Express 23, 7227 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  20. Y.T. Zhao, B. Wu, B.J. Huang, Q. Cheng, Opt. Express 25, 7161 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  21. Y.M. Qing, H.F. Ma, T.J. Cui, ACS Photonics 6, 2884 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. Y.M. Qing, H.F. Ma, T.J. Cui, Carbon 145, 596 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  23. Y.M. Qing, H.F. Ma, Y.Z. Ren, S. Yu, T.J. Cui, Opt. Express 27, 5253 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  24. C.L. Wang, Y.Q. Wang, H. Hu, D.J. Liu, D.L. Gao, L. Gao, Opt. Express 27, 35925 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Qu, M. Rao, S. Li, D. Li, AIP Adv. 7, 095307 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  26. B. Wu, Y. Hu, Y.T. Zhao, W.B. Lu, W. Zhang, Opt. Express 26, 15353 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  27. V.P. Gusynin, S.G. Sharapov, J.P. Carbotte, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 026222 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  28. G.W. Hanson, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 064302 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. F. Valmorra, G. Scalari, C. Maissen, Nano Lett. 13, 3193 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  30. J.S. Gómez-Díaz, J. Perruisseau-Carrier, Opt. Express 21, 15490 (2013) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. B. Sensale-Rodriguez, R. Yan, M.M. Kelly et al., Nat. Commun. 3, 780 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  32. B. Wu, H.M. Tuncer, M. Naeem, B. Yang, M.T. Cole, W.I. Milne, Y. Hao, Sci. Rep. 4, 4130 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  33. H. Chen, W. Lu, Z. Liu, J. Zhang, A. Zhang, B. Wu, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Technol. 66, 3807 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  34. H. Murata, K. Nozawa, N. Saitoh, N. Yoshizawa, T. Suemasu, K. Toko, Appl. Phys. Express 13, 055502 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  35. J.S. Gomez-Diaz, C. Moldovan, S. Capdevila, J. Romeu, L.S. Bernard, A. Magrez, A.M. Ionescu, J. Perruisseau-Carrier, Nat. Commun. 6, 6334 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Chen, M. Badioli, P. Alonso-González, S. Thongrattanasiri, F. Huth, J. Osmond, M. Spasenović, A. Centeno, A. Pesquera, P. Godignon, A.Z. Elorza, N. Camara, F.J. García de Abajo, R. Hillenbrand, F.H.L. Koppens, Nature 487, 77 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  37. L. Yang, C. Pei, A. Shen, C. Zhao, Y. Li, X. Li, H. Yu, Y. Li, X. Jiang, J. Yang, Sci. Rep. 5, 9206 (2015) [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Yao-Jia Yang, Bian Wu, Yu-Tong Zhao, Chi-Fan, Dual-band beam steering THz antenna using active frequency selective surface based on graphene, EPJ Appl. Metamat. 8, 12 (2021)

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of (a) 3D view, (b) top view, and (c) bottom view of the proposed AFSS unit cell. The relevant geometrical dimensions are p = 60, l1 = 55, l2 = 22, l3 = 16, l4 = 24, l5 = 11, w1 = 2, w2 = 2, w3 = 5, a = 12, all in μm. The thicknesses of the p-type doped silicon, silicon dioxide substrates are h1 = 3 μm, h2 = 0.3 μm, respectively.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Surface current distribution of AFSS in different states at frequencies f1 = 0.96 THz and f2 = 1.21 THz, respectively.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

The transmission or reflection spectra of the AFSS unit cell. (a) Transmission with various μc1 and fixed μc2. (b) Transmission with various μc2 and fixed μc1. (c) Reflection in four coded states. (d) Transmission in four coded states. (e) The reflection and (f) transmission spectra with various incident angles from 0° to 40° for TE polarizations.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

(a) 3D view of the proposed dual-band beam steering THz antenna. (b) Geometry of the broadband omnidirectional monopole source antenna. The relevant geometrical dimensions are m = 72, n = 144, g1 = 33.6, g2 = 43.2, all in μm. (c) Reflection coefficients of the broadband omnidirectional source antenna and the dual-band beam steering THz antenna under different states. (d) Radiation patterns of the omnidirectional source antenna on the horizontal plane at two frequencies.
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Topologies of the beam steering antenna under different ON/OFF states. (a) Case I, (b) Case II, (c) Case III and (d) Case IV. Radiation patterns in the azimuth plane of (be Case I at 0.96 THz, (f) Case I at 1.21 THz, (g) Case II at 1.21 THz, (h) Case II at 0.96 THz, (i) Case III at two frequencies, and (j) Case IV at two frequencies.
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.