Issue 
EPJ Appl. Metamat.
Volume 5, 2018
Metamaterials'2017 – Metamaterials and Novel Wave Phenomena: Theory, Design and Application



Article Number  9  
Number of page(s)  12  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/epjam/2018005  
Published online  08 October 2018 
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjam/2018005
Review
First ten years of active metamaterial structures with “negative” elements
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing,
Unska 3,
Zagreb,
HR10000, Croatia
^{*} email: silvio.hrabar@fer.hr
Received:
18
September
2017
Accepted:
27
June
2018
Published online: 8 October 2018
Almost ten years have passed since the first experimental attempts of enhancing functionality of radiofrequency metamaterials by embedding active circuits that mimic behavior of hypothetical negative capacitors, negative inductors and negative resistors. While negative capacitors and negative inductors can compensate for dispersive behavior of ordinary passive metamaterials and provide wide operational bandwidth, negative resistors can compensate for inherent losses. Here, the evolution of aforementioned research field, together with the most important theoretical and experimental results is reviewed. In addition, some very recent efforts that go beyond idealistic impedance negation and make use of inherent nonideality, instability, and nonlinearity of realistic devices, are highlighted. Finally, a very fundamental, but still unsolved issue of common theoretical framework that connects causality, stability, and nonlinearity of networks with negative elements is stressed.
Key words: Active metamaterial / NonFoster / Causality / Stability / Nonlinearity
© S. Hrabar, published by EDP Sciences, 2018
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1 Introduction
All materials (except vacuum) are dispersive [1,2] due to inevitable resonant behavior of electric/magnetic polarization. The simplest physical picture deals with mechanical inertia of polarized particles, caused by their finite mass. Due to inertia, the particles cannot respond instantaneously to an external electromagnetic field. Thus, there will be a phase lag/lead between particle movement and applied oscillating field. Clearly, this effect causes a change of relative permittivity and permeability with frequency (i.e. the dispersion). An electrical engineering model of this phenomenon comprises an RLC resonant circuit (Lorentz dispersion model with “parallel” (f_{p}) and “series” (f_{s}) resonant frequency [1,2], Fig. 1).
Here, the resonant energy redistribution between electric and magnetic fields describes the mechanical inertia. Inspection of the Lorentz curve (Fig. 1) shows that the dispersion is negligible if a material is used far below its parallel resonant frequency (f_{p}). Actually, this is the case of most of ordinary dielectrics in radiofrequency and microwave regime.
However, if one wants to make use of phase lead effect (i.e. of the occurrence of negative or lessthanunity effective constitutive parameters: EpsilonNeGative, MuNeGative, EpsilonNearZero, and MuNearZero), the dispersion becomes significant. The same behavior applies for metamaterials, in which above effects occur to the resonant energy redistribution in some kind of an electromagnetic structure [2]. Thus, every passive material (or metamaterial) with negative or lessthanunity effective parameters is inevitably narrowband. This fact is mathematically expressed in the form of wellknown energydispersion constraints [1,2]: (1)
Very similar equations apply for any reactive element in circuittheory (Foster's reactance theorem) [3,4]: (2)
Here ε and μ stand for permittivity and permeability while X and B are reactance and susceptance, respectively, Symbol ω represents angular frequency.
Obviously, ordinary reactive circuit elements (capacitors and inductors) obey Foster's theorem. However, one might (hypothetically) define new “negative” (or “nonFoster”) elements: negative capacitor (C_{n} < 0) and negative inductor (L_{n} < 0) (Fig. 2).
Due to negative capacitance/inductance, the terminal current of these elements is negative (it flows outward from the positive terminal). Thus, a negative capacitor and a negative inductor behave as (reactive) sources, i.e. they are inevitably active devices [2].
It is important to notice that energydispersion constraints (and Foster's theorem) have been derived assuming that there are no losses present [1,3–5]. So, strictly speaking, hypothetical negative resistor (an active element that delivers real power [4]) should not be termed as a “nonFoster element”. However, one might say that a negative capacitor, a negative inductor, together with a negative resistor form a complete group of (hypothetical) “negative circuit elements”. These ideal elements are postulated to be linear and dispersionless (Fig. 3).
In practice, “negative” elements are mimicked by appropriate electronic circuitry, so called “Negative Impedance Converters”, [6,7] and “Negative Impedance Inverters”, [8,9], proposed more than 60 years ago. In essence, these are specially designed amplifiers with positive feedback. A positive feedback is needed in other to assure impedance sign flipping in the case of NICs (Z_{in} ∼ −Z_{load}) or impedance sign flipping accompanied with the impedance inversion in the case of NIIs (Z_{in} ∼ −1/Z_{load}), Z_{in} and Z_{load} being the input and load impedance, respectively. In order to get acquainted with the aforementioned principle, it is instructive to briefly explain the simplest voltageconversion NIC (Fig. 4). The (grounded) load impedance that should be inverted (Z) is shown in the left part of Figure 4. The load can be a lumped element of any type (a capacitor, an inductor, or a resistor). In order to invert the load impedance, one swaps the sign of the input current (I). This is done by inserting an additional “dependent” voltage source of amplitude 2V in series with impedance Z (the middle part of Fig. 4). This dependent source is actually a voltage amplifier with gain equal to +2 (the right part of Fig. 4). The voltage drop across the impedance is now equal to −V (the left electrode has potential of V and the right one has potential of 2 V). This causes the inversion of the impedance Z_{in} (as seen from the input terminals): (3)
A more general equation that allows use of complex gain function of realistic active element can be found in [2,6,7,10].
There are also some electronic elements (such as tunnel diodes and Gunn diodes [4]) that show negative resistance effects (but not negative capacitance or negative inductance!) per se. They again contain some kind of positive feedback, which occurs at a microscopic level due to background semiconductor physics. Traditionally, these elements have been used for construction of amplifiers and oscillators in the microwave community [4].
The first potential application of negative capacitors and inductors (that has been investigating for many years and it is still active nowadays) is broadband matching of small antennas [10]. Briefly , this matching relies on the compensation of frequency dispersion of an ordinary reactive network with the “inverse” dispersion of a “negative” nonFoster network. This compensation yields (theoretically) infinite bandwidth. Apart from matching, several (mostly theoretical) studies, that investigated the use of active elements in periodic structures for various microwave applications such as manipulation of bianisotropy [11] and emulation of perfectly matched layers (ideal absorbers) [12,13], were published in the past.
Particularly interesting is an idea of 'artificial atoms' that comprise circuits based on OPerational AMPlifiers (even including NIC circuits) [14]. Those “atoms” were proposed for construction of artificial structures that perform linear and nonlinear shaping of a waveform of electromagnetic excitation signal.
The first paper (to the best of Author's knowledge) that theoretically discussed a possible use of active nonFoster elements for “dispersion compensation” in metamaterials was published in 2001 [15]. It analyzed the equations for polarizability of metamaterials based on an ensemble of short loaded dipoles and small loaded loops. In [15] it was shown analytically that a loading of a short dipole with a negative capacitance (instead of ordinary, positive inductance) should lead to the wideband dispersionless ENG behavior. Similarly, the loading of a small loop with a negative inductance (instead of ordinary, positive capacitance) should lead to the wideband dispersionless MNG behavior. In this case, the bandwidth would be limited only by the bandwidth of the realized nonFoster element itself. Thus, the inherent energydispersion constraints (1) would be bypassed.
Theoretical analysis from [15] initiated a new way of thinking and encouraged researchers all around the world to try to bring this interesting idea to reality. The field of active “negative” metamaterials has been growing rapidly. Nowadays it goes beyond broadband (almost dispersionless) operation, and includes powerflow reversal, nonlinear, and oscillatory behavior. This paper points out some of the most important (in Author's personal opinion) theoretical and experimental results obtained so far. On the other hand, it also tries to stress the “bottlenecks” of this technology, related to some very fundamental but still unclear issues.
Fig. 1
Lorentz dispersion model. Solid: real part of relative permittivity/permeability, Dashed: imaginary part of relative permittivity/permeability. 
Fig. 2
Solid: reactance of positive (Foster) reactive elements, Dashed: Reactance of negative (nonFoster) reactive elements [20]. 
Fig. 3
Linear dispersionfree models of ideal negative elements. (a) negative capacitor, (b) negative inductor, (c) negative resistor. 
Fig. 4
Simplified explanation of the generation of negative impedance by a voltageconverting NIC [2]. 
2 Evolvement of the research field and current state of the art
2.1 Active metamaterials and metamaterialinspired devices
The idea from [15] was extended using a transmissionline model of an isotropic material in [16]. Briefly, a standard transmissionline model comprises a series RL branch (impedance of which is proportional to the complex permeability) and a shunt GC branch (admittance of which is proportional to the complex permittivity) (the black elements in Fig. 5a). Here L, C, R and G stand for distributed inductance, capacitance, resistance, and conductance, respectively. In the case of ordinary passive MNZ or MNG metamaterials, one includes an additional lumped capacitor into the series branch (Fig. 5a). This causes a resonant redistribution of energy from the magnetic field (previously stored in a series distributed inductance) into the electric field (within additional lumped capacitor). Mathematically, new series combination possesses either zero impedance (μ_{r} ∼ 0, the MNZ effect at the resonant frequency) or a capacitive impedance (μ_{r} < 0, the MNG effect below the resonant frequency).
Similarly, one can include additional inductance into the shunt branch (the inductor in Fig. 5a) and achieve either the ENZ (ε_{r}∼0) or the ENG (ε_{r} < 0) behavior. Of course, if both series and shunt braches are loaded (with series capacitor and shunt inductor, respectively), it is possible to achieve DoubleNearZero (ε_{r }∼ 0, μ_{r }∼ 0) or DNG (ε_{r} < 0, μ_{r} < 0) behavior. At first sight, the circuit in Figure 5b should lead to a singleresonance Drude dispersion model (the Lorentz model with f_{p} = 0). However, as detailed in [2], the inevitable “parasitic” capacitance of a realistic inductor and “parasitic” inductance of a realistic capacitor introduce additional resonance(s). Thus, the circuit (and the whole metamaterial) obeys the Lorentz dispersion (lower part of Fig. 5a). The main drawback of this (classical) passive metamaterial is a very pronounced inherent dispersion. From the circuit theory point of view, one may say that this dispersion occurs due to the basic difference in the frequency behavior of a capacitor and an inductor (solid curves in in Fig. 2).
However, if one (following a basic theoretical idea from [15]) replaces an additional shunt inductor with a negative capacitor (Fig. 5b)), it will cause a (dispersionless) decrease of overall capacitance. Thus, resulting nearzero (or negative) behavior of equivalent permittivity will also be entirely dispersionless [17–20]: (4)
Here Δ stands for the unit cell dimension. Clearly, very similar expression can be derived for the equivalent permeability in the case of added series negative inductor [17–20]: (5)
Thus, if negative elements are ideal, the real parts of effective permittivity, permeability will be “flat” with frequency (lower part of Fig. 5b). What is the background physics of this dispersionless behavior? Actually, the negative capacitor and negative inductor behave as frequencydependent controlled sources [21,22] that supply additional currents to the positive elements. For instance, there is an additional current in the shunt branch (caused by the negative capacitor). This current causes faster charging of the distributed capacitance and, therefore, it decreases the overall effective capacitance (and effective permittivity). Instead of an energy redistribution from the electric field into magnetic field (or vice versa) used in passive metamaterial, here one introduces an additional energy flow from the active device (that has its own DC power supply).
The first experimental verification of above concept was the realization of a single ENZ nonFosterbased unit cell [20], previously proposed theoretically in [16]. The cell was constructed using NII FETbased negative capacitor incorporated into a 2D microstrip unit cell. Measurement of effective permittivity showed fairly constant ENZ behavior (0.25 <ε_{r} < 0.35) within the octave bandwidth (1–2 GHz) [2,20]. Measured results were also used as input data for ADS^{TM} simulation of a proposed active 2D plasmonic cloak [20] and showed operating relative bandwidth of 100% (comparing to relative bandwidth of 20% in the case of a passive cloak).
Application of nonFoster elements in broadband cloaking was refined later in several studies. The analysis of a thin cylindrical cloak with rectangular patches, edges of which are loaded with negative capacitors showed significant bandwidth enhancement [23,24]. Along the same line, application of nonFoster elements (both negative capacitors and negative inductors) in an anisotropic cylindrical cloak was studied in [25], and a very wide cloaking bandwidth (1:5) was predicted. It is important to notice that all these studies on nonFoster cloaking were entirely analytical and numerical while experimental realization has not been reported so far.
The first practical 1D active ENZ metamaterial (an air transmission line loaded with three OPampbased negative capacitors, as shown in Fig. 6a and b) was analyzed, built and tested in the lower RF regime [2,26]. The real part of effective permittivity (extracted from the measurements of a full scattering matrix) was found to be rather constant (it varied from 0.27 to 0.37), in the frequency range of 2–40 MHz (bandwidth of more than four octaves), Figure 6c. This bandwidth is significantly wider than a bandwidth of any passive ENZ metamaterial. In addition, the propagation characterization in both frequency and time domain revealed that such a “nonFoster transmission line” supports counterintuitive (but causal) superluminal phase and group velocities [26,27], Figure 6d. Later, similar experiments, based on an air transmission line loaded with three negative capacitors (constructed as Linvill's bipolartransistorbased floating NICS [7]), operating from 60 MHz to 120 MHz and from 50 MHz to 220 MHz, were reported in [28] and in [29], respectively. It is interesting that the authors in [29] verified “superluminal” propagation not only by extraction from measured scattering matrix, but also from near field measurements of the electric field in air above the transmission line. The longest (38 unit cells) “superluminal” nonFoster transmission line, operating from 42 MHz to 60 MHz has also been constructed and tested recently [30]. In this thesis, the author also conducted thorough analysis of the practical limitations on “superluminal propagation” in nonFoster transmission lines.
The examples reviewed so far used onedimensional nonFoster metamaterial structures (i.e. transmission lines). The first attempt to directly apply the basic idea of an array of small antennas loaded with nonFoster elements in order to achieve 2D or 3D metamaterial was reported in [31]. Briefly, a 2 x 2 array of vertical dipoles loaded with negative capacitors, operating in the low RF frequency range (up to 50 MHz), was located within a simple parallelplate capacitor that imposed periodic boundary conditions in the vertical direction. In such a way, a structure behaved as a “pile” with infinite number of layers, i.e. as a 2 ½ D structure. Equivalent permittivity was extracted from the measurement of capacitance of a parallelplate capacitor. Obtained bandwidth (10–20 MHz, i.e. one octave) was again wider than the bandwidth of passive ENZ metamaterials. However, this bandwidth was clearly narrower than the bandwidth of a 1D active transmissionlinebased ENZ metamaterial reported in [26]. This happened due to capacitive coupling between neighboring dipoles that cannot be compensated by nonFoster elements (a very similar effect, but within a different context, was discussed in [32]). Several similar designs of volumetric 3D metamaterials with negative elements were proposed theoretically in [33]. No experimental realization of a volumetric 3D nonFosterbased metamaterial structure has been published so far.
In recent years, the whole electromagnetic community has focused their research efforts on thin artificial sheets (socalled metasurfaces [34]), which are 2D equivalents of metamaterials. An obvious advantage of this approach is a smaller number of unit cells (that results with lower losses) and very simple fabrication. There are some reports on nonFosterbased metasurfaces, as well. The broadband nonFosterbased artificial magnetic conductor (highimpedance metasurface) was reported in [35,36]. It was based on an array of small (in terms of wavelength) patches with a central grounded pin (“mushrooms”), mutually connected with negative inductors fabricated in microelectronic technology. The measurements, performed in a specially designed tapered coaxial TEM cell verified behavior very similar to that of an ideal magnetic conductor within 200–400 MHz bandwidth. In addition, the broadband nonFosterbased metasurface with very low dispersion was reported in [37]. Two different versions of metasurfaces, containing 7 × 10 unit cells with patches were manufactured. NonFoster LC circuits were connected across the gaps of neighboring patches, compensating the dispersion of a bare array. The nearfield measurements showed almost dispersionless refractive index of 1.3 and 1.5, over the fractional bandwidth of 56% (450–800 MHz). The last example of a nonFoster metasurface is a broadband absorber [38]. It comprised a thin (less than λ/100, λ being the signal wavelength) array of vertical wires periodically loaded with negative LC circuits (implemented using OPamp technology). This array was used as a termination of a simple TEM transmission line, a reflection coefficient of which was measured by a vector network analyzer. Measured return loss was better than 10 dB across a 150–950 MHz band, indicating broadband absorption. Additional measurements and discussion on matching properties of similar type of absorber (with magnetic material) were also published very recently [39].
For the sake of completeness, one should look at “metamaterialinspired” applications that, instead of employing negative elements in metamaterials/metasurfaces extend basic principles to some other field. The first example is the enhancement of properties of small antennas by adding nonFoster elements into the antenna structure and, therefore, changing its current distribution (it is worth stressing that this approach is radically different from “external” active matching). There are several both theoretical [40] and experimental studies [41–44] of this idea. The second example is a squintfree leaky wave (LW) antenna based on a transmission line periodically loaded with negative capacitors, proposed in [45] and later analyzed in [46,47]. This type of nonFoster antenna has been analyzed theoretically and numerically, while there is no experimental investigation reported so far.
Fig. 5
Transmissionline models of different metamaterials (a) Passive metamaterial, (b) Active nonFosterbased metamaterial, (c) Active gainbased metamaterial. 
Fig. 6
The first nonFoster ENZ transmission line (1D nonFoster metamaterial) ([2,26,27]). (a) Basic blockdiagram, (b) A photo of manufactured prototype, c) Measured effective permittivity, solid–real part, dashed − imaginary part, (d) Measured signal velocities, solid − group velocity, dashed phase velocity. 
2.2 Technological issues
Let us point out some of the important issues in the design of nonFosterbased unit cell per se. Firstly, the cutoff frequency of an active element has significant impact on the achievable operation bandwidth [2,20]. The cutoff frequency should be significantly higher than the required highest operating frequency of the negative capacitor. As a rule of thumb, one could say that the cutoff frequency should be at least ten times higher than the maximal operating frequency [20]. This comes from a very simple fact that the operation of all NIC and NII circuits is based on either voltage or current inversion. The inversion requires a phase shift of zero degrees between the input and the output of the circuit. Nearly zero phase shift can be achieved only at very low frequencies, for which the transit time across the active device can be neglected. Although not obvious at first sight, the same requirement on cutoff frequency applies to a variant of NII circuits that (instead of a classical amplifier) employs a ‘converting network ‘with positive and negative resistors [8].
The second important issue is the tradeoff between different technologies (BJT, FET, OPamp, customdesigned integrated circuit, and special microwave elements such as a resonant tunnel diode). Generally speaking, use of OPamps is limited by the maximal operating frequency, which for the fastest devices nowadays lies around 2 GHz. Thus, the maximal frequency of an associated OPampbased negative element could be couple hundreds of MHz. It is a rather low frequency that obviously excludes microwave applications. However, the OPampbased design is very simple, without complicated DC bias networks. The problem of occurrence of parasitic capacitances and inductances is not pronounced and the repeatability of manufactured circuits (even in the case of simple “handcrafting”) is excellent. Therefore, OPamp technology is a very convenient choice for constructing proofofconcept demonstrators.
Use of discrete BJT and FETs assures higher operating frequency of associated negative elements, which is currently around 1–2 GHz [20,48]. On the other hand, there are problems with “parasitics”, the influence of an unwanted phase shift of connecting leads on the circuit parameters is rather pronounced, and rather complicated active biasing networks are often needed [2,20]. Thus, the use of discrete BJT and FET elements yields broad bandwidth, but it is accompanied with rather complicated design and challenging repeatability (especially in the case of “handcrafting”).
The next possibility is the use of negative elements based on specially designed integrated circuits. This solution offers a very high operating frequency that lies in the UHF [49] or even in the microwave regime [50–52] and parasitic effects are negligible. The downside is that the microelectronic technology is (initially) very costly and not available for many research groups. There is also a rather interesting approach based on oneport negativeresistance microwave elements such as resonant tunnel diodes as a part of abovementioned resistive converting network [53]. This approach offers high operating frequency (in the GHz regime) and a design of mild complexity.
Yet another very interesting approach employs similarity between NeGativeDelay circuits (the circuits that employ phenomenon of anomalous dispersion in the vicinity of the loss line) and nonFoster behavior [54–56]. It employs a resonant structure with pronounced losses, which are needed for the NGD effects. The losses are compensated by the inclusion of an integrated amplifier. In such a way, it was shown possible not only to build unidirectional nonFosterlike unit cells, but also to construct a practical squintfree steerable antenna array operating within 1–1.5 GHz band [56].
In addition, there are several very recent examples of digital nonFoster elements [57,58]. They are based on monitoring original input voltage (or current) signal via A/D converter, analyzing it by processing circuitry, and modifying it by the injection of an additional signal via D/A converter. By doing this, any value of positive/negative impedance can be emulated. This approach is very versatile and almost completely immune to component ageing and imperfections. The drawback is a low operating frequency (around 100 MHz), constrained with state of the art digital signal processing hardware.
In all above examples, it is in principle, possible to add tunability and reconfigurability features. In [33], several simple OPampbased demonstrators of negative capacitors and inductors were constructed using standard electronic tuning elements (the varactors and PIN diodes). In this way, it was possible to build the ENZ unit cell with tunable relative permittivity from 0.2 to 0.8, and the MNZ unit cell with tunable relative permeability from 0.2 to 0.5, both operating across very wide bandwidth (100 khz–700 MHz). Similar approach that used a FETbased variable resistance was applied in a microelectronic realization of negative inductance [49]. Achieved tuning range was −64 nH–−40 nH, within 400–600 MHz band.
Apart from the use of negative capacitors and negative inductors, several research groups proposed the use of negative resistors (“active gainbased metamaterial structures”) [5,18]. Here, the main idea is not dispersion management but rather the compensation of inherent losses. Simply, a negative resistor is incorporated either in series or shunt branch of a given transition line (i.e. metamaterial structure) (Fig. 5c) [5]. Of course, the negativeresistance elements also have their own DC sources, so there is again an additional energy flow into the metamaterial structure. The advantage of this approach is a relatively simple design (particularly if one uses oneport devices as tunnel diodes). In addition, negativeresistance devices are available across almost whole RF and microwave regimes.
Finally, several studied used embedded amplifiers for gain compensation and dispersion management of inclusionbased metamaterials [59,60]. The embedded amplifier might be considered as a special case of (unidirectional) negative resistor (similarly to already discussed NGD unidirectional negativecapacitor unit cell [54–56]). The approach in [59] employs a “sensing and intervening” structure. The “sensing” (receiving) loop is connected to the amplifier that modifies the signal (both the amplitude and phase) and radiates it back into the metamaterial structure via “intervening” (transmitting) loop. This method yielded a low loss MNG metamaterial operating in UHF (500–800 MHz) regime with a bandwidth of 25%. Improved version reported in [60] (with additional splitrings and voltagecontrolled phase shifter) showed zeroloss with tunable magnetic response.
2.3 Stability
The most important problem that still prevents widespread application of metamaterial structures with negative elements is the stability management [2]. All negative elements (both nonFoster capacitors and inductors as well as negative resistors) employ some kind of a positive feedback, which in some case leads to instability. This issue is still not well understood, which makes a design of stable nonFoster circuits extremely challenging.
Many methods of stability prediction that are routinely used in microwave engineering fail in the case of nonFoster networks. A detailed review of this problem is given in [61–64]. Briefly, there are two important issues: selection of the domain of analysis and the representation of an analyzed network. The simplest approaches use the analysis in phasor domain (steadystate analysis with real frequencies). This approach neglects the transient response that is crucial in nonFoster circuits, so it should not be used. Thus, stability analysis in the Laplace domain (with complex frequency s = σ + jω) or in the time domain is a first prerequisite (necessary, but not always sufficient!) for the reliable stability prediction. The second prerequisite is associated with the representation of an analyzed network. The methods that reduce the network to the equivalent “black box” and then look at the properties of the “black box” input port impedance (or reflection coefficient) may fail. Several examples of such failure are given in [2,62–64], for the case of the widely used Rollet method. For instance, the modulus of the reflection coefficient of an ideal negative capacitance is one, as is the modulus of an ordinary positive capacitance. Looking at this result, one could (wrongly) conclude that a pure negative capacitor is a stable device. However, a very simple and intuitive transient analysis [65] clearly shows an unbounded growth of voltage across the negative capacitance, i.e. instability. This happens due to the inherent poles located in the RightHandSide of a complex plane, the existence of which cannot be inferred just from the analysis of the “black box” input port reflection coefficient (the existence of socalled “hidden modes”) [62–64]). In order to avoid problems with hidden modes one should use the method (either in the Laplace domain or in the time domain) that takes into account all the meshes and nodes of the analyzed network. Thus, only the methods that use Laplace domain (or time domain) and take into account all the meshes and nodes of the analyzed network (analysis of system determinant [62,63], Normalized Determinant Function [66], Nyquist method [63], etc.) are always reliable and cannot result with incorrect stability prediction.
Another important fact is that stability does not depend only on the nonFoster element but also on the other elements in a given network [61]. Usually, it is believed that it is enough to fulfill widely accepted stability criterion that the overall “mesh” capacitance or inductance must be positive number. This criterion was discussed in details in [67,68,72]. A common way of achieving this “compensation” is the insertion of an additional positive element (the socalled “swamping element”) in series or in parallel to negative element. Therefore, a new equivalent element (a combination of positive and negative element) behaves as an ordinary positive element. Since all positive elements are stable, it appears logical that a new combination should always be stable. Actually, that is the reason why early efforts dealt only with nearzero (ENZ/MNZ) metamaterials (negative (ENG/MNG) metamaterials violate above stability criterion) [19,20,26,27].
Some time ago, it was found that it might be possible to build a stable ENG, MNG, or DNG nonFoster metamaterial [33,69,70] (although that appeared impossible in previous studies [19,20,26,27]). As shown in [33,61,69], a network comprising solely negative elements is inherently stable (as is an ordinary network that contains solely positive elements). In such a structure, the power flow is reversed (the energy travels towards the source). First experimental confirmation [33] demonstrated a stable negative RLC circuit with reversed power flow. Following these initial efforts, one may include negative resistors into a nonFoster circuit obtaining an “all negative part” connected to an “all positive part” (ordinary network with positive R,L,C elements) (Fig. 7). This system is stable providing that overall resistance, capacitance and inductance is negative. The experiment in [33] revealed that energy indeed flows from the negative part into the positive part of the system. It is important to notice that this system contains only lumped elements without any transmission line.
However, there are (at least) two issues that put some doubts on the above simple stability analysis based on overall positive (or overall negative) capacitance and inductance. Firstly, it was shown that the presence of “swamping” elements is not always necessary [62]. For instance, a simple equivalent circuit of an ideal transformer (that is, of course, an unconditionally stable device) contains some negative elements without “swamping” neighbors [62]. Similar example that involves an equivalent circuit of lattice unit cell of periodic structure was shown in [55]. In addition, one should not forget that the overall “mesh” criterion was derived postulating that nonFoster elements are entirely dispersionless (Fig. 3). Unfortunately, ideal dispersionless negative elements violate basic physics (causality and linearity [21,22,70]), and, therefore, they cannot exist in practice. Indeed, the gain of every realistic active element used in “negative” circuitry (regardless of used technology) is always bandlimited. Hence, realistic negative elements will always be bandlimited, dispersive devices (Fig. 8).
Furthermore, required negative reactance is always accompanied by occurrence of unwanted resistance (either positive or negative), Fig. 8. This fact may be interpreted as a special case of KramersKronig relations (or, in a broader sense, of causality [1]). So, in practice, it is impossible to generate a pure negative capacitance or a pure negative inductance. This unfortunate fact makes stability prediction extremely challenging.
It is interesting that some theoretical studies predicted serious stability problems in early 1D nonFoster metamaterials [71]. On the contrary, there are several reports on successful practical realizations [19,20,26,27]. This again emphasizes that the stability issue in nonFoster networks is still not wellunderstood.
Very recent study [72] of negative capacitors shed some new light on stability. It was shown that the stability criterion of a positive “mesh” capacitance fails for the combination of positive and ideal negative capacitor, connected via a segment of transmission line. Such a network is always unstable, for any line length (different than zero) and capacitance values of positive and negative capacitor. These problems are caused by an unstable pole that is located on the real axes in the RHS of a complex plane. It is rather counterintuitive since the real pole supports zerofrequency (“DC”) exponentially growing signals. This appears as “bad news” since all kinds of negative elements (including microelectronic realizations) will inevitably have some connecting leads of finite length. It could mean that these systems would always be unstable. Surprisingly, the limited bandwidth of a realistic negative capacitor (i.e. that inherent dispersion, Fig. 8) may, for some design parameters, suppress the occurrence of the real pole. In other words, nonideality of the negative element, in some case, assures stable operation. This might be the explanation why some experimental studies reported stable operation [19,20,26,27] although the associated theoretical analysis (based on ideal elements) predicted instability. Even more surprisingly, in some cases, a nonideality of used elements can assure stable operation of a network with negative overall capacitance or inductance [72]. This novel effect can be used for the construction of stable dispersionless ENG/MNG/DNG metamaterials.
Concerning the stability of 2D structures with negative elements, there are very few papers published so far. In [73–75] the authors analyzed a 2D array of small loops loaded with negative elements (2D magnetoinductive metamaterial) and investigated the influence of various design parameters on stability. This analysis was done using an equivalent circuit of generalized magnetoinductive metamaterial and applying Nyquist criterion.
Along a similar line of thought, the authors in [76] analyzed incorporation of inclusions loaded with negative elements both into generalized multilayer 2D structures and into a simple patch array. Both the analytical investigation based on equivalent circuit and fullwave numerical results were presented.
The stability of active gainbased metamaterial structures appears to be a slightly simpler task [18]. Here, stability primarily depends on the remaining negative resistance within unit cell (“left” after loss compensation), and the overall number of gain cells in the structure. These issues can be analyzed using standard, welldeveloped (and wellunderstood) theory of reflection amplifiers and negativeresistance oscillators [4].
Fig. 7
Stable structure based on a mixture of “positive” (passive) and “negative” (active) parts. 
Fig. 8
Linear (dispersive) models of realistic negative elements. (a) Negative capacitor, (b) negative inductor, (c) negative resistor. 
3 Open questions, new ideas, and future trends
3.1 Tailoring stability properties by “exotic” design
Obviously, it would be convenient to avoid occurrence of a real pole in a nonFoster network and, therefore, assure stable operation. As indicated in [72] it could be possible by a “bandpass” design of the negative element. This proposal is similar to stability analysis of a hypothetical nonFoster element that behaves as a negative capacitance within a finite frequency band, (outside of this band it behaves as ordinary inductance [77]). The “bandpass” approach might be useful for construction of stable broadband ENG, MNG and DNG metamaterials. Whether these “bandpass negative elements” (which, strictly speaking, are not negative capacitors or inductors, anymore) can indeed be constructed in practice, is open question. In the University of Zagreb Group, the design and testing of a lowfrequency experimental demonstrator of a “bandpass negative capacitor” is under progress.
Another open question is whether “all negative metamaterials” with reversed power flow, based on negative capacitance, inductance and resistance [33,69] (Fig. 7) can be brought to real engineering applications. Although the basic idea was developed using ideal dispersionless elements (that cannot exist in practice), some recent studies indicate that negative power flow is possible with realistic elements, as well [70].
3.2 Nonlinear and oscillatory behavior for active resonator/antenna/metasurface applications
Yet another open question is whether one can always neglect the nonlinear properties of negative elements. Actually, all previous examples presumed linear operation. However, exponential growth predicted in [72] will certainly drive the circuitry into a nonlinear regime. Similar behavior is well understood in the case of negativeresistance oscillators (wellknown “N” and “S” curves, [4]). Recently, it was shown possible to construct similar curves by introducing “apparent electric charge” and “apparent magnetic charge” (“apparent flux”) for the cases of negative capacitor and negative inductor, respectively [70], Figure 9a and b. By the use of generalized “N” and “S” curves it is possible to predict change of generated negative capacitance and inductance as a function of input signal magnitude. It would certainly help in accurate design of selfoscillating, broadband nonFoster radiating structures, introduced experimentally in [78,79]. Actually, these are unstable negative structures, impedance of which is a “negative image” of the antenna impedance (Fig. 9c). In this way, it is possible to achieve a tunable and perfectly matched transmitterantenna system, or even a metasurfacebased transmitting array across the 1:10 bandwidth [79]. This approach is fundamentally different from the ordinary active antenna since the dispersion of antenna impedance does not influence matching. Particularly important is an extension of this approach to resonatorfree selfoscillating metasurface tuned by injection locking from an external beam, within a very broad bandwidth [78,79]. Moreover, the non linearity can also be used for up/down conversion into different frequency bands. In all these applications, inherent instability of negative capacitors and inductors is an advantage, rather than a drawback.
Furthermore, there is a similarity between metamaterials based on “negative elements” and PTsymmetry systems, as shown in [80]. This may lead to development of novel distributed, broadly tunable oscillators and antenna transmitter systems. Observed similarity can even be extended to recently proposed “EM field teleportation” systems [81], which again highlights importance of reversed powerflow from [33,69].
Fig. 9
(a) Generalized N curve of a nonlinear negative element [70], (b) Generalized S curve of a nonlinear negative element [70], (c) A concept of selfoscillating tunable nonFoster antennatransmitter [78,79]. 
3.3 Adding bianisotropic (reciprocal or nonreciprocal) behavior
The concept of bianisotropy, although being very old, has been applied to transmissionlinebased metamaterials very recently. An interesting example is experimental omega transmission line [82], which is actually a broadband version of the wellknown omega medium. The basic idea is an additional crosscoupling between series and shunt braches of the transmission line via transformer [17] (or, equivalently, the crosscoupling between orthogonal components of electric and magnetic field vectors of a plane wave). This principle was further extended in [83] using active coupling (via gyrator) enabling movingmedia behavior. The same idea may be applied for both gainbased and nonFosterbased active metamaterials. It would provide stable bianisotropic (both reciprocal and non/reciprocal) behavior across a wide RF band. Particularly interesting would be the combination of negative elements with a metasurface with exotic boundary conditions such as the DB boundary [84,85]. This might be a way towards implementation of an active metasurface that emulates generally linear boundary conditions [86].
3.4 Basic theoretical issues that are still unclear
It should be stressed that the progress in all practical engineering applications of active metamaterials/metasurfaces based on negative elements is rather challenging due to basic, but still unsolved theoretical problem. Namely, a construction of a unified theoretical framework that connects causality, stability and nonlinearity of “negative elements”. Particularly, it was shown that there are many similarities between negative group delay, “superluminal” effects, and nonFoster behavior in steadystate conditions [70]. But, a theoretical link that takes stability into account (i.e. the connection in Laplace domain) is unclear.
In addition, one intuitively expects that stability and causality are somehow connected. However, at the moment it is not even clear whether KramersKronig relations can always be applied for testing the causality of active metamaterials or not [87,88]. The problem is the wellknown prerequisite for the use of KramersKronig relations. It states that there should not be any poles in the RHP of a complex plane (assuming engineering e^{jωt} time convention). Thus, for a causality prediction of some system, one should a priori presume its stability. If stability cannot be presumed, KramersKronig relations should not be used. As a solution, one may turn to general relativistic causality [87]. However, again, it is not clear how to apply this test in the case of systems with negative elements. It is very important to stress that a missing theoretical framework is not just an “academic issue”. On the contrary, it has very strong practical consequences. If one cannot apply some tool for causality testing, one cannot predict whether expected effects are indeed physically feasible or not [22]. If a unified theoretical framework were available, it would be possible to better understand effects that currently slow down the development of the field of active negativeelementsbased metamaterials.
4 Conclusion
The field of active metamaterial structures based on “negative circuit elements” (negative capacitors, negative inductors and negative resistors) has grown extensively within its first decade. Specifically, nonFoster broadband metamaterial structures have been improved and their properties are becoming closer to those needed in realword applications. In addition, there are some novel ideas that go beyond idealistic impedance negation. These make use of inherent nonideality, instability and nonlinearity of realistic devices for future selfoscillating and selfmixing antenna applications. So, the future of the field appears exciting. It is interesting that, in spite of a great progress and many practical demonstrations of novel effects, some very fundamental issues are still unclear. Thus, the development of a unified theoretical framework that connects causality, stability, and nonlinearity is probably one of the most important future tasks.
Acknowledgments
Part of this material reviews results achieved by the Author's group at the University of Zagreb, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing. These results are based upon the work on the following projects: “Electromagnetic Metamaterials and Nanoelectromagnetics”, MZT, Contract 03603615661571; “Broadband EpsilonNearZero (ENZ) and MuNearZero (MNZ) Active Metamaterial', EOARD/AFRL, Contract FA 86551013030; 'Passive and Active Metamaterial Structures for Guiding, Scattering and Radiation of Electromagnetic Energy”, UKF, Contract 09/13; 'Active Reconfigurable Metamaterial Unit Cell Based on NonFoster Elements’, EOARD/AFRL, Contract FA86551212081; “NonFoster Sourceload Networks and Metasurfaces”, EOARD/AFRL Contract FA9550151 0120; “Active Ultrawideband Transmitterantenna System”, HAMAGBICRO Contract POC6_1_233.
References
 G.L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshits, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, 2nd edn, (Buttterwoth Heinmann, Oxford, 2002) [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, I. Krois, I. Bonic, A., Kiricenko, E.U. Munoz, Broadband EpsilonNearZero (ENZ) and MuNearZero (MNZ) Active Metamaterial, Final Report for Contract FA 86551013030, EOARD/AFRL, August 2011 [Google Scholar]
 R.M. Foster, A reactance theorem, Bell Labs Syst. Tech. J. 3, 259 (1924) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 D.M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering (Willey, New York, 1998) [Google Scholar]
 Q. Tang, Active Metamaterial: Gain and Stability, and Microfluidic Chip for THz Cell Spectroscopy, PhD thesis, The University of Arizona, 2017, http://hdl.handle.net/10150/623025 [Google Scholar]
 J.L. Merrill, Theory of the negative impedance converter, Bell Sys. Tech. J. 30, 88 (1951) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J.G. Linvill, Transistor negative impedance converters, Proc. IR 41, 725 (1953) [Google Scholar]
 L. Verman, Negative circuit constants, Radio Eng. Proc. Inst. 19 676 (1931) [Google Scholar]
 B. van der Pol, A new transformation in alternatingcurrent theory with an application to the theory of audition, Radio Eng. Proc. Inst. 18 220 (1930) [Google Scholar]
 A.K. Perry, Broadband antenna systems realized from active circuit conjugate impedance matching, AD769 800, Naval Postgraduate School, 1973, http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/769800.pdf [Google Scholar]
 F. Auzanneau, R.W. Ziolkowski, Theoretical study of synthetic bianisotropic materials, J. Electromag. Waves 12, 353 (1998) [Google Scholar]
 R.W. Ziolkowski, The design of Maxwellian absorbers for numerical boundary conditions and for practical applications using engineered artificial materials, IEEE Trans. Ant. Propagat. 45 656. [Google Scholar]
 S.A. Tretyakov, T.G. Kharina, The perfectly matched layer as a synthetic material with active inclusions, Electromagnetics 20 155 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 F. Auzanneau, R.W. Ziolkowski, Artificial composite materials consisting of nonlinearly loaded electrically small antennas: operationalamplifierbased circuits with applications to smart skins, IEEE Tran. Ant. Prop. 47 1330 (1999) [Google Scholar]
 S. Tretyakov, Metamaterials with wideband negative permittivity and permeability, Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 31, 163 (2001) [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, I. Krois, B. Ivsic, D. Zaluski, G. Pavlaković, Active Dispersionless “ Plasmonic” Metamaterial − a Step Towards Broadband Cloaking, in: Proc. of the 2008 IEEE APS International Symposium and USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting (San Diego, 2008), p. 203 [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, Active nonFoster metamaterials: from intriguing background physics to realworld applications, a plenary talk, in: proc. on metamaterials congress (Sankt Petersburg, 2012) [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, Active radiofrequency metamaterial structures – Pros, cons and future trends, in: Proc. on Metamaterials Congress (Oxford, 2015) [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, Active Dispersionless Metamaterials − a Path towards broadband Cloaking, in: Proc. on 2009 REME Workshop (Madrid, 2009) [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, I. Krois, A. Kiricenko, Towards active dispersionless ENZ metamaterial for cloaking applications, J. Metamaterials 4 89 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 B. Okorn, S. Hrabar, I. Krois, Investigation of basic physics of nonFoster negative capacitance in time domain, in: Proc. on ELMAR, (Zadar, 2011) p. 373 [Google Scholar]
 B. Okorn S. Hrabar, I. Krois, Physically sound model of a nonFoster negative capacitor, Automatika: J. Control Meas. Electron. Comput. Commun. 55, 244 (2017) [Google Scholar]
 P.Y. Chen, C. Argyropoulos, A. Alù, Broadening the cloaking bandwidth with nonFoster metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 233001 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J.C. Soric, A. Alù, Wideband tunable and nonFoster mantle cloaks, presented at USNCURSI Nat Radio Sci Meeting, Boulder, CO, USA, 2014 [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, Z. Sipus, I. Malcic, Broadening of cloaking bandwidth by passive and active techniques, in: D. Werner, D. Kwon (Eds.) A chapter in Transformation Electromagnetics and Metamaterials (Springer, London, 2013) [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, I. Krois, I. Bonic, A. Kiricenko, Negative capacitor paves the way to ultrabroadband metamaterials, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 25403 (2011) [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, I. Krois, I. Bonic, A. Kiricenko, Ultrabroadband simultaneous superluminal phase and group velocities in nonFoster epsilonnearzero metamaterial, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 054081 (2013) [Google Scholar]
 J. Long, M. Jacob, D. Sievenpiper, Broadband fastwave propagation in a nonFoster circuit loaded waveguide, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn. 62, 789 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 A. Niang, A. de Lustrac, S.N. Burokur, Superluminal wave propagation in a nonFoster negative capacitor loaded transmission line, Electron. Lett. 53, 547 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J. Long, NonFoster Circuit Loaded Periodic Structures for Broadband Fast and Slow Wave Propagation, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego, 2015, escholarship.org/uc/item/1q90m4jj.pdf [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, I. Krois, I. Bonic, A. Kiricenko, NonFoster elements − new path towards broadband ENZ and MNZ metamaterials, in: Proc. on EUCAP, (Prague, 2011), p. 2674 [Google Scholar]
 G. Eleftheriades, Analysis of bandwidth and loss in negativerefractiveindex transmissionline (NRITL) media using coupled resonators, IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett. 17, 412 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, I. Krois, I., Bonic, A. Kiricenko, D. Muha, Active Reconfigurable Metamaterial Unit Cell Based on NonFoster Elements, Final Report for Contract FA86551212081, 2013 EOARD /AFRL [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 H.T. Chen, A.J. Taylor, N. Yu, A review of metasurfaces: physics and applications, Rep. prog. phys. 79, 1 (2016) [Google Scholar]
 D. Gregoire, C. White, J. Colburn, Wideband artificial magneticconductors loaded with nonFoster negative inductors, IEEE Ant. Wirel. Prop. Lett. 10, 1586 (2011) [Google Scholar]
 D.J. Gregoire, C.R. White, J.S. Colburn, A coaxial TEM cell for direct measurement of UHF artificial magnetic conductors, IEEE Ant. Prop. Mag. 54, 251 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J. Long, D. Sievenpiper, Lowprofile and lowdispersion artificial impedance surface in the UHF band based on nonFoster circuit loading, IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 64, 3003 (2016) [Google Scholar]
 J. Mou, Z. Shen, Design and experimental demonstration of nonFoster active absorber, IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 65, 696 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J. Mou, Z. Shen, Broadband and thin magnetic absorber with nonFoster metasurface for admittance matching, Sci. Rep. 7, 1 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 M. Barbuto, A. Monti, F. Bilotti, A. Toscano, Design of a nonFoster actively loaded SRR and application in metamaterial inspire components, IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 61, 1219 (2013) [Google Scholar]
 N. Zhu, R.W. Ziolkowski, Broadbandwidth electrically small antenna augmented with an internal nonFoster element, IEEE Ant. Wirel. Propag. Lett. 11, 1116 (2012) [Google Scholar]
 N. Zhu, R.W. Ziolkowski, Broad bandwidth, electrically small, nonFoster elementaugmented antenna designs, analyses, and measurements, IEICE Tran. Comm. 96, 2399 (2013) [Google Scholar]
 F. AlbarracínVargas, V. GonzalezPosadas, F. Javier HerraízMartinez, D. SegoviaVargas, Design method for actively matched antennas with nonFoster elements, IEE Tran. Ant. Prop. 64, 4118 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 H. Mirzaei, G.V. Eleftheriades, A resonant printed monopole antenna with an embedded nonFoster matching network, IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop. 61, 5363 (2013) [Google Scholar]
 D.F. Sievenpiper, Superluminal waveguides based on nonFoster circuits for broadband leakywave antennas, IEEE Ant. Wirel. Prop. Lett. 10, 231 (2011) [Google Scholar]
 D. Muha, S. Hrabar, I. Krois, I. Bonic, A. Kiricenko, D. Zaluski, Design of UHF Microstrip NonFoster Leakywave Antenna, in: Proc. ICECOM (Dubrovnik, 2013), p. 134 [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, Leakywave Antenna based on NonFoster Metamaterial − is stable operation feasible? in: Proc. on IWAT (Seoul, 2015), p. 7 [Google Scholar]
 O.O. Tade, Negative impedance converter for antenna matching, PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, 2014, http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/4920/1/Tade14PhD.pdf [Google Scholar]
 C.R. White, J.W. May, J.S. Colburn, A variable negativeinductance integrated circuit at UHF frequencies, IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett. 22, 35 (2012) [Google Scholar]
 S. Saadat, H. Aghasi, E. Afshari, H. Mosallaei, Lowpower negative inductance integrated circuits for GHz applications, IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett. 25, 118 (2015) [Google Scholar]
 S.E. SussmanFort, Gyratorbased biquad filters and negative impedance converters for microwaves, Int. J. RF Microwave CAE 8, 86 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 S. Kolev, B. Delacressonniere, J. Gautier, Using a negative capacitance to increase the tuning range of a varactor diode in mmic technology, IEEE Tran. Microw. Theory Tech. 49, 2425 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 D.S. Nagarkoti, Y. Hao, D.P. Steenson, L. Li, E.H. Linfield, K.Z. Rajab, Design of broadband nonFoster circuits based on resonant tunneling diodes, IEEE Ant. Wirel. Propag. Lett. 15, 1398 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 H. Mirzaei, G.V. Eleftheriades, Realizing nonFoster reactive elements using negativegroupdelay networks, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn. 61, 4322 (2013) [Google Scholar]
 H. Mirzaei, Negativegroupdelay and nonFoster electromagnetic structures, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Elect. Comput. Eng., Toronto Univ., Toronto, ON, Canada, 2015. [Google Scholar]
 H. Mirzaei, G.V. Eleftheriades, Arbitraryangle squintfree beamforming in seriesfed antenna arrays using nonFoster elements synthesized by negativegroupdelay networks, IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag 63, 1997 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 T.P. Weldon, J.M.C. Covington, K. Smith R.S. Adams, Performance of digital discretetime implementations of nonFoster circuit elements, in: Proc. on ISCAS (Lisbon, 2015), p. 2169 [Google Scholar]
 P.J. Kehoe K.K. Steer T.P. Weldon, Thevenin forms of digital discretetime nonFoster RC and RL circuits, in: Proc. on IEEE APS/URSI (Fajardo, 2016), pp. 191–192 [Google Scholar]
 B.I. Popa, S.A. Cummer, An architecture for active metamaterial particles and experimental validation at RF, Microw. Opt. Techn. Lett. 49, 2574 (2007) [Google Scholar]
 Y. Yuan, B.I. Popa, S.A. Cummer, Zero loss magnetic metamaterials using powered active unit cells, Optics Expr. 17 16135 (2009) [Google Scholar]
 E. UgarteMuñoz, S. Hrabar, D, SegoviaVargas, A. Kiricenko, Stability of NonFoster reactive elements for use in active metamaterials and antennas, IEEE Tran. APS 60, 3490 (2012) [Google Scholar]
 S. Stearns, Counterintuitive Aspects of NonFoster Networks, Presentation slides from Adelphi Antenna Workshop on Electrically Small Antennas, Clarksville, MD, July 89, 2010 [Google Scholar]
 S.D. Stearns, NonFoster Circuits and Stability Theory, in: Proc. on IEEE APS/URSI (Spokane, 2011), p. 1942 [Google Scholar]
 S.D. Stearns, Incorrect Stability Criteria for NonFoster Circuits, in: Proc. on IEEE APS/URSI (Chicago, 2012), p. 1 [Google Scholar]
 S. Tretyakov, S. Maslovski, Veselago materials: what is possible and impossible about the dispersion of the constitutive parameters, IEEE Ant. Prop. Mag. 49, 37 (2007) [Google Scholar]
 Q. Tang, H. Xin, Stability analysis of NonFoster circuit using normalized determinant function, IEEE Tran. Microw. Theory Techn. 65, 3269 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 S.E. SussmanFort, Matching Network Design Using NonFoster Impedances, Presentation slides, http://www.ieee.li/pdf/viewgraphs/matching_network_design_non _foster_impedances.pdf [Google Scholar]
 S.E. SussmanFort, NonFoster impedance matching of electricallysmall antennas, IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop. 57, 2230 (2009) [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, Is Stable dispersionless nonFoster DNG Metamaterial Indeed Impossible? in: Proc. on Metamaterial Congress (Copenhagen, 2014), p. 13 [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, Metamaterial Structures based on “Negative” ElementsWhat Do We Know After a Decade of Research? in: Proc. on Metamaterial Congress (Rome, 2017) p. 197 [Google Scholar]
 S.R. Rengarajan, C.R. White, Stability analysis of superluminal waveguides periodically loaded with nonFoster circuits, IEEE Anten. Wireless Prop. Lett. 12, 1303 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J. Loncar, S. Hrabar, D. Muha, Stability of simple lumpeddistributed networks with negative capacitors, IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop. 65, 390 (2017) [Google Scholar]
 Y. Fan, Research and Design of NonFoster Active Metamaterials, Ph.D. Thesis, Queen Mary University, United Kingdom, 2013, http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/8727 [Google Scholar]
 K.Z. Rajab, Y. Hao, D. Bao, C.G. Parini, C. Vazquez, J. Philippakis, M. Philippakis, Stability of active magnetoinductive metamaterials, J. Appl. Phys. 108, 0549041 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 K.Z. Rajab, Y.F. Fan, Y. Hao, Characterization of active metamaterials based on negative impedance converters, J. Opt. 14, 1140041 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 S. Saadat, M. Adnan, H. Mosallaei, E. Afshari, Composite metamaterial and metasurface integrated with nonFoster active circuit elements: a bandwidthenhancement investigation, IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. 61, 1210 (2013) [Google Scholar]
 S.D. Stearns, Stable Bandpass Non Foster Circuits, in: Proc. on IEEE APS/URSI (Vancouver, 2015), p. 1386 [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, A. Kiricenko, Towards broadband tunable nonFoster radiating systems, in: Proc. on Metamaterials Congress, (Crete, 2016), p. 133 [Google Scholar]
 S. Hrabar, A. Kiricenko, I. Krois, Antennatransmitter based on NonFoster Source, in: Proc. on IEEE APS/URSI (San Diego, 2017), p. 875 [Google Scholar]
 J. Loncar, S. Hrabar, A. Kiricenko, Stability of MetasurfaceBased ParityTime Symmetric Systems, in: Proc. on Metamaterial Congress, (Crete, 2016), p. 738 [Google Scholar]
 Y. Ràdi, D.L. Sounas, A. Alù, S.A. Tretyakov, Paritytime symmetric teleportation, Phys. Rev. B 93, 235427 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J Vehmas, S. Hrabar, S. Tretyakov, Omega transmission lines with applications to effective medium models of metamaterials, J. App. Phys. 115, 1349051 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J. Vehmas, S. Hrabar, S. Tretyakov, Transmission lines emulating moving media, N. J. Phys. 16, 1 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 D. Zaluski, S. Hrabar, D. Muha, Practical realization of DB metasurface, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 2341061 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 D. Zaluški, A. Grbic, S. Hrabar, Analytical and experimental characterization of metasurfaces with normal polarizability, Phys. Rev. 93, 1551561 (2016) [Google Scholar]
 I.V. Lindell, A. Sihvola, Electromagnetic wave reflection from boundaries defined by general linear and local conditions, IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop. 65, 4656 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J. Skaar, Fresnel equations and the refractive index of active media, Phys. Rev. E 73, 0266051 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 A. Fang, Reducing the losses of optical metamaterials, Ph.D. Thesis, Iowa State University, 2013, http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/11807 [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: Silvio Hrabar, First ten years of active metamaterial structures with “negative” elements, EPJ Appl. Metamat. 5, 9 (2018)
All Figures
Fig. 1
Lorentz dispersion model. Solid: real part of relative permittivity/permeability, Dashed: imaginary part of relative permittivity/permeability. 

In the text 
Fig. 2
Solid: reactance of positive (Foster) reactive elements, Dashed: Reactance of negative (nonFoster) reactive elements [20]. 

In the text 
Fig. 3
Linear dispersionfree models of ideal negative elements. (a) negative capacitor, (b) negative inductor, (c) negative resistor. 

In the text 
Fig. 4
Simplified explanation of the generation of negative impedance by a voltageconverting NIC [2]. 

In the text 
Fig. 5
Transmissionline models of different metamaterials (a) Passive metamaterial, (b) Active nonFosterbased metamaterial, (c) Active gainbased metamaterial. 

In the text 
Fig. 6
The first nonFoster ENZ transmission line (1D nonFoster metamaterial) ([2,26,27]). (a) Basic blockdiagram, (b) A photo of manufactured prototype, c) Measured effective permittivity, solid–real part, dashed − imaginary part, (d) Measured signal velocities, solid − group velocity, dashed phase velocity. 

In the text 
Fig. 7
Stable structure based on a mixture of “positive” (passive) and “negative” (active) parts. 

In the text 
Fig. 8
Linear (dispersive) models of realistic negative elements. (a) Negative capacitor, (b) negative inductor, (c) negative resistor. 

In the text 
Fig. 9
(a) Generalized N curve of a nonlinear negative element [70], (b) Generalized S curve of a nonlinear negative element [70], (c) A concept of selfoscillating tunable nonFoster antennatransmitter [78,79]. 

In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.