Issue 
EPJ Appl. Metamat.
Volume 4, 2017
Metamaterials'2017 – Metamaterials and Novel Wave Phenomena: Theory, Design and Application



Article Number  9  
Number of page(s)  4  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/epjam/2017011  
Published online  01 December 2017 
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjam/2017011
Research Article
Negative index effects from a homogeneous positive index prism
^{1}
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, Ltd.,
Haifa, Israel
^{2}
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology,
Haifa, Israel
^{*} emails: shermanwmarcus@gmail.com; shermanm@technion.ac.il
Received:
4
September
2017
Accepted:
25
October
2017
Published online: 1 December 2017
Cellular structured negative index metamaterials in the form of a right triangular prism have often been tested by observing the refraction of a beam across the prism hypotenuse which is serrated in order to conform to the cell walls. We show that not only can this negative index effect be obtained from a homogeneous dielectric prism having a positive index of refraction, but in addition, for sampling at the walls of the cellular structure, the phase in the material has the illusory appearance of moving in a negative direction. Although many previous reports relied on refraction direction and phase velocity of prism structures to verify negative index design, our investigation indicates that to unambiguously demonstrate material negativity additional empirical evidence is required.
© S.W. Marcus and A. Epstein, published by EDP Sciences, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1 Introduction
Wave propagation through a medium with a negative index of refraction and across its boundaries has been of major interest in recent years. The problem was first hypothesized by Veselago [1], but became particularly relevant with the ability to create such “metamaterials”. For example, negative permittivity can be achieved by arrays of wires [2], and negative permeability can be achieved by arrays of split ring resonators [3]. These cellular structures have been combined to produce metamaterials with a negative refraction index [4–7].
The properties of such cellular materials have been experimentally tested by shaping them into a right triangular prism, and observing a wave that propagates normal to one leg of the prism (represented by the arrow labelled “Incident ray” in Fig. 1 with θ_{inc} = θ_{p}), is incident on the prism hypotenuse (the surface AC in Fig. 1), and is negatively refracted into a positive index medium (the arrow labelled “Negative refraction” in Fig. 1) [4–12]. Observation of this negatively refracted wave was deemed sufficient proof that the index of the prism material was negative. Such claims were supported by numerical simulations which demonstrated negative phase velocity within the material [9–11].
Although the typical metamaterial model describes the wave phenomena in the artificial material via an equivalent homogenized medium, in practice the device is made of unit cells of finite size. In order to avoid cutting through walls in the middle of such unit cells, the hypotenuse in experimental tests is usually serrated so that the material boundary coincides with these walls (surface AC in Fig. 1). It is well known that a plane wave crossing such a periodic boundary can result in a spectrum of waves compatible with both positive and negative refraction [13,14]. In this paper, we show (Sect. 2) that a serrated hypotenuse can produce a negatively refracted wave in any desired direction using a positive index prism material. Instead of a spectrum of waves, this negatively refracted wave would often be the only wave propagating across the boundary, thereby providing the impression that the material itself has a negative index of refraction. It is further shown (Sect. 3) that the field sampled at the cell walls within the positive index prism (i.e. at the locations of the red dots along the incidence arrow in Fig. 1) will exhibit an illusory negative phase velocity consistent with the desired negative refraction.
Section 4 applies the developments in Sections 2 and 3 to previously published measurement configurations of negative index designs. These are all shown to be compatible with positive index materials. This implies that experimental observations of negative refraction − even accompanied by numerical measurements of negative phase velocity − are not necessarily indicative of a negative index material. In particular, our work reveals that wave scattering observations for a serrated prism are not sufficient for verifying negativity, and other evidence should be provided to establish the latter unambiguously. It should be emphasized that in experiments cited herein [4–12], such evidence has indeed been provided.
Although this study was prompted by the serrated geometry utilized in experiments to verify negative index designs, it suggests an extremely simple configuration for obtaining negative index effects using available materials. Negative effects from nonnegative materials have previously been reported using photonic crystals [15–18]. These take advantage of the periodicity within the crystal material. In contrast, the negative index effects described in Sections 2 and 3 below apply to a positiverefractionindex prismshaped material that is homogeneous, with the periodicity derived only from the surface of its hypotenuse. In other words, the same negative index phenomena can be observed with a simple geometry, comprised solely of bulk natural materials.
Fig. 1
Propagation through a cellular prismshaped material with serrated hypotenuse. The red dots along the incident ray trajectory denote the intersection between the ray and the cell walls parallel to the yaxis where the phase is sampled to evaluate the phase velocity (see Sect. 3). 
2 Negative refraction
Consider a two dimensional prism, characterized by a prism angle θ_{p}, with a serrated hypotenuse with period d (Fig. 1). When a plane wave is incident on that hypotenuse, plane waves will be transmitted into the air at angles θ_{m} given by the grating formula [19]: (1) where λ_{0} is the wavelength in air, n_{p} is the index of the prism material, and m is an integer denoting the order of the FloquetBloch mode. The factor γ = sin θ_{p}/sin θ_{inc} is indicative of the closeness of the incident wave direction to the direction normal to the leg AB of the prism, and d_{x} = d sin θ_{p} is the lattice period in the x direction (Fig. 1). To emulate an index of refraction n_{c}, we set (2)which transforms (1) into (3)If the term in brackets is interpreted as an effective index of refraction, then (3) is in the form of Snell's law. For the m = −1 mode, this effective index of refraction will be n_{c}. If n_{c} is negative, then negative refraction will be emulated for this m = −1 mode even though the actual refraction index n_{p} is positive. But this will be the case only if this m = −1 mode represents a propagation wave (and not an evanescent wave). Propagating waves will be produced only for values of m for which sinθ_{m} < 1. For n_{c} < 0, the condition for only the m = −1 mode to propagate is (4)For example, assume it is desired to emulate a negative index n_{c} = −1 for a lattice characterized by λ_{0}/d_{x} = 4, D_{x}/D_{y} = 1/2 where D_{x}, D_{y} are the lengths of the prism legs (Fig. 1), and for θ_{inc} = θ_{p} = tan^{−1}(D_{x}/D_{y}) = 26.57 so that γ = 1. This can be accomplished from (2) by a prism with positive index n_{p} = 3. From (3), waves will propagate when 3+4m < 2.24 which can only be satisfied for m = −1, so that (4) is satisfied. Using the methods of [20], if E_{inc} is the amplitude of the incident wave and the prism relative permeability is unity, the “negatively refracted” wave amplitude will be >0.8E_{inc} [21]. This lessthanoptimal result is due to energybackscatter from the periodic surface by a specularly reflected wave and by two grating lobes.
To verify these results for the above parameters, field computations using the finitedifference timedomain “T” solver of the CST Microwave Studio computer program [22] are shown in Figure 2 for a frequency of 10 GHz, with the leg length D_{y} = 7.5λ_{0}. The transverse electric (E_{x} = E_{y} = 0) incident plane wave was simulated by a Gaussian beam the wave direction of which is indicated by the arrow in the figure. The only airprism boundary accounted for in the computations was that across the prism hypotenuse.
This single wave in the air would appear as if it had been “negatively refracted” in accordance with (3) even though it had originated in a positive index material. The source of this “refraction” is, of course, the periodic geometry of the hypotenuse which, as indicated, is present in most experimental tests of negative material designs [4–12]. Although this periodic geometry derives from the assumed cellular form of the prism, this cellular form plays no other role in the computations, so the material can be assumed homogeneous.
It is worth noting that the observed effect is not limited to cellular structures that obey homogenization (λ_{0}/d_{x} ≫ 1), which are the focus of this paper. Equations (2)–(4) are equally applicable to smaller values of λ_{0}/d_{x}with appropriate values of n_{c} and θ_{inc}.
Fig. 2
CST Efield results for Gaussian beam incidence from the prism into the air. See Supplementary Material for an animated version of this figure. 
3 Negative phase velocity
Even though the propagation described by (3) and illustrated in Figure 2 can produce a single wave with negative refraction characteristics, the phase velocity of the incident wave within the prism will be positive since n_{p} > 1. Nevertheless, it will now be shown that simulation of this incident wave can produce the appearance of negative phase velocity.
The prism in Figure 1 is divided into imaginary cells which are filled with a material with a positive index , the value of which, for the time being, will be assumed unknown. We are interested in the phase of the wave at the points indicated by red dots along the incident ray of Figure 1. Assuming an exp(−iωt) time dependence where ω is the angular frequency, the change of phase of the incident wave over a single cell row of thickness d_{x} (i.e. from one red dot to the next in the direction of the incident ray in Fig. 1) will be (5) where k_{0} = 2π/λ_{0} is the wave number in free space, and β = cos(θ_{inc} − θ_{p}). Similarly, for a prism with negative index n_{c}, this change of phase would be negative: (6)But, because of the equivalence of phase angles that differ by integer multiples of 2π, this negative phase difference is equivalent to the positive phase difference (7)But this positive phase difference can be achieved in a positive index medium in accordance with (5). The refractive index of that medium can therefore be obtained by equating (5) with (7): (8)Therefore, the phase of a wave in a material with negative index n_{c} can be emulated on the discrete lattice walls by a homogeneous material with positive index given by (8). To clarify this, consider as before n_{c} = −1, λ_{0}/d_{x} = 4, θ_{inc} = θ_{p}, so that . The incident waves within materials characterized by and n_{c} would be given by and cos(k_{0}n_{c}x−ωt), and are illustrated in Fig. 3 for several values of ωt. Although these waves move in opposite directions since the signs of and n_{c} are opposite, the phase of both waves coincides along the lattice walls (vertical lines in Fig. 3) at every instant ωt. Therefore, if the phase of the wave in the positive medium (solid curves) is sampled only on the lattice walls, it would appear to be moving in the negative direction, particularly since there are more sampled points per wavelength for the negative wave than for the positive wave. (See Supplementary Material for a dynamic demonstration of this phenomenon).
This observation is important since investigators have typically employed numerical simulations within a proposed negative prism to supplement wave measurements outside it [9–11]. However, as shown, if the inprism field is naively sampled at lattice intervals, the phase would appear negative even in a positive medium. Thus, to properly verify negative phase velocity, one has to be aware of this “illusion”, and tune the sampling resolution to suitable values.
Fig. 3
The equivalence along cell boundaries of the phase in a negative medium (dashed curve moving leftward, n_{c} = −1) and the phase in a positive medium (solid curve moving rightward, ). An arrow indicates an extremum for each wave at each time. See Supplementary Material for an animated version of this figure. 
4 Prism experiments
For a given θ_{inc}, the required to emulate the phase by n_{c} material in (8) is generally different from the n_{p} required to emulate refraction by n_{c} material in (2). An exception to this is when θ_{inc} = θ_{p}, which is precisely the incidence angle used in experimental material tests, since it corresponds to a wave direction that is normal to leg AB (Fig. 1). This implies γ = β and , so that, in principle, these tests can appear to produce both negative refraction and negative phase velocity consistent with the same negativerefractionindex even if the material were positive.
Table 1 provides examples of the application of these principles to published measurements of negative index designs using prismshaped materials. Each entry in the table contains the relevant parameters employed in the measurements documented in the reference listed in the first column, and with the observed refraction index n_{c}. These were used to compute from (2) the positive index n_{p} which would produce the same negatively refracted wave across the serrated surface, and the indices m which satisfy sin θ_{m} < 1 using (3) thereby assuring that the corresponding wave is propagating and not evanescent.
The most striking outcome of Table 1 is that not only are all measurement configurations compatible with an m = −1 “negativelyrefractedwave” for propagation from a positive material across a serrated boundary, but that wave is the only wave predicted to propagate. For all measurements, a single negatively refracted wave was observed. However, in [7] an additional positively refracted wave was also observed contrary to predictions.
It should be emphasized that the ability to reproduce the measurements using a positive index material does not imply that the materials in the cited references are not negative. On the contrary, these references do provide additional evidence to support negative material claims. However, it does demonstrate that refraction direction measurements are generally not sufficient to prove a material is negative.
Measurement configurations for negative material design verification, and computed positive materials for producing the same negative refraction characteristics.
5 Conclusions
We have shown that negative refraction effects can be obtained from a relatively simple configuration of a right triangular prism with a serrated hypotenuse. The prism material is composed of a homogeneous isotropic dielectric, the positive index of which depends on the negative refraction index n_{c} that is to be emulated, and on the ratio of the wavelength to the cell size. This negative refraction is complemented by an illusory negative phase velocity − consistent with n_{c} − along virtual transverse cell walls within the material.
Although many previous reports relied on refraction direction measurements and on field simulations to verify negative index design, our investigation shows that additional empirical evidence is required to unambiguously prove material negativity. It is therefore essential that negative index effects be distinguished from negative index materials.
References
 V.G. Veselago, Sov. Phys. Usp. 10, 509 (1968) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J.B. Pendry, A.J. Holden, D.J. Robbins, W.J. Stewart, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10, 4785 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J.B. Pendry, A.J. Holden, D.J. Robbins, W.J. Stewart, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 47, 2075 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 R.A. Shelby, D.R. Smith, S. Schultz, Science 292, 77 (2001) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 C.G. Parazzoli, R.B. Greegor, K. Li, B.E.C. Koltenbah, M. Tanielian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 107401 (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 R.B. Greegor, C.G. Parazzoli, K. Li, B.E.C. Koltenbah, M. Tanielian, Opt. Express 11, 688 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 A.A. Houck, J.B. Brock, I.L. Chuang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 137401 (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 M. NavarroCía, M. Beruete, F. Falcone, M. Sorolla, Prog. Electromag. Res. Vol. PIER 103, 139 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 M. NavarroCía, M. Beruete, M. Sorolla, I. Campillo, Opt. Express 16, 560 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J. Valentine, S. Zhang, T. Zentgraf, X. Zhang, Proc. IEEE 99, 1682 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J. Valentine, S. Zhang, T. Zentgraf, E. UlinAvila, D.A. Genov, G. Bartal, X. Zhang, Nature 455, 376 (2008) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 M.C. VelazquezAhumada, M.J. Freire, J.M. Algarin, R. Marques, Am. J. Phys. 79, 4 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 D.R. Smith, P.M. Rye, J.J. Mock, D.C. Vier, A.F. Starr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 130401 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 S. Larouche, D.R. Smith, Opt. Lett. 37, 2391 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 C. Luo, S.G. Johnson, J.D. Joannopoulos, J.B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. B 65, 20 (2002) [Google Scholar]
 C. Luo, S.G. Johnson, J.D. Joannopoulos, J.B. Pendry, Opt. Express 11, 7 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 A. Martínez, J. Martí, Phys. Rev. B 71, 235115 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 A. Martínez, J. Martí, Opt. Express 14, 6755 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 D. Maystre, Scholarpedia 7, 11403 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 R.A. Depine, A. Lakhtakia, Phys. Rev. E 69, 057602 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 The computer program on which the results of this paper are based is provided at http://arielepstein.webs.com/Software/PASS.zip. It relies on FloquetBloch mode expansions [20], and computes the direction and amplitude of each propagating mode and the amplitude of each evanescent mode. [Google Scholar]
 www.cst.com [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: Sherman W. Marcus, Ariel Epstein, Negative index effects from a homogeneous positive index prism, EPJ Appl. Metamat. 2017, 4, 9
Supplementary Material
Supplementary files supplied by authors. (Access here)
All Tables
Measurement configurations for negative material design verification, and computed positive materials for producing the same negative refraction characteristics.
All Figures
Fig. 1
Propagation through a cellular prismshaped material with serrated hypotenuse. The red dots along the incident ray trajectory denote the intersection between the ray and the cell walls parallel to the yaxis where the phase is sampled to evaluate the phase velocity (see Sect. 3). 

In the text 
Fig. 2
CST Efield results for Gaussian beam incidence from the prism into the air. See Supplementary Material for an animated version of this figure. 

In the text 
Fig. 3
The equivalence along cell boundaries of the phase in a negative medium (dashed curve moving leftward, n_{c} = −1) and the phase in a positive medium (solid curve moving rightward, ). An arrow indicates an extremum for each wave at each time. See Supplementary Material for an animated version of this figure. 

In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.