Issue 
EPJ Appl. Metamat.
Volume 9, 2022
Metamaterials for Novel Wave Phenomena in Microwaves, Optics, and Mechanics



Article Number  5  
Number of page(s)  14  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/epjam/2022003  
Published online  17 February 2022 
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjam/2022003
Research Article
Metagrating solutions for full color singleplate waveguide combiner
InterDigital R&D France, Immersive Media Lab., 975 Avenue des Champs Blancs, 35576 Cesson Sévigné, France
^{*} email: Oksana.Shramkova@interdigital.com; o.shramkova@gmail.com
Received:
15
October
2021
Accepted:
17
January
2022
Published online: 17 February 2022
In this work we propose several fullcolor metagrating solutions for single waveguidebased Augmented and Virtual Reality neareye display systems. The presented solutions are based on a combination of reflective and/or transmissive diffraction gratings inside or outside a waveguide. The proposed incoupler designs have high diffraction efficiency across a wide angular range. Applying our new grating combination solution, we can provide good gathering of diffracted rays for the different colors. We demonstrate that by using a dualmode symmetrical incoupling system and angular pupil tiling, we can extend the overall horizontal FoV for three RGB colors. The new characteristics of the full single waveguide system including Eye Pupil Expander and outcoupling components compatible with the proposed incoupling solutions are discussed. We show that a new nonsymmetrical design of metagratings can be used to change its diffraction properties improving the diffraction efficiency and diffraction uniformity of the optical components.
Key words: Optical combiner for AR glasses / diffractive gratings / metasurface / edge waves
© O. Shramkova et al., Published by EDP Sciences, 2022
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1 Introduction
Augmented/virtual reality (AR/VR) is a fastgrowing technology trend that has a broad range of applications. Optical seethrough head mounted display is a key device for AR/VR applications attracting significant interest of major industrial players [1–3]. To realize a compact neareye display system, various technologies have been developed [4–11]. Currently most of the head mounted displays use the waveguide structure in order to reduce the overall size and weight of the device [1]. The basic optical components integrated into the waveguide combiners consist of in and outcouplers, and the Eye Pupil Expander (EPE) which are fabricated as diffractive optical elements [12,13] or holographic volume gratings [14,15]. Some of kinds of AR/VR glasses utilize optical waveguides wherein light propagates into the optical waveguide by Total Internal Reflection (TIR). The Field of View (FoV) of the waveguide depends on the waveguide material refractive index. To couple light into the waveguide and provide good color uniformity, the main diffracted order should have high diffraction efficiency across a wide angular range. Such functionality can be achieved by using singlemode nonsymmetrical gratings [1,12] with nonsymmetrical optical power distribution between diffraction orders (T_{j} ≠ T_{–j}, R_{j} ≠ R_{–j}…., where j is the number of diffraction order, T and R are the transmissivity and reflectivity of the gratings) leading to maximal grating efficiency for desired diffraction order. Changing the period of nonsymmetrical gratings we can get onaxis (symmetrical) or offaxis (asymmetrical) incoupling for the desired FoV of the device. To develop a waveguide display system with a wide FoV we can tile angularly the exit pupil of the lightengine. In such a system the angular exit pupil of the system is split by the grating in such a way that one portion is diffracted into a first direction into the waveguide, and the remaining portion into the opposite direction. Usually, the exit pupil is split with respect to the waveguide's normal, it means that the rays corresponding to positive and negative angles of an incidence will be diffracted by the system into opposite directions. Such a system doubles the FoV as each halfimage can use the whole angular bandwidth of the waveguide in each direction of propagation. To provide such functionality, we can use a dualmode system with symmetrical gratings [13,16] which achieves symmetrical response between the orders (T_{j} = T_{–j}, R_{j} = R_{–j}), or combine two singlemode nonsymmetrical gratings [12,17–19]. In the last systems to get similar functionality, the rays corresponding to positive and negative angles will be diffracted by two differently oriented nonsymmetrical gratings. The exit pupil will be reconstructed again at the eyebox by a properly oriented outcoupler, and the users will see one single virtual image.
In Figure 1 we have illustrated one important way of using symmetric diffraction gratings to achieve pupil tilling and to double the FoV of a single wavelength system by using two propagation directions inside of a flat waveguide. The period of the transmissive diffraction grating was selected for a particular wavelength and for an angular range covering overall FoV, assuming that the rays incident on the incoupler with angles get diffracted inside the waveguide with critical angles , while those with angles in the vicinity of the normal get diffracted with grazing angles , respectively (see Fig. 1). This means that all rays on the righthand side of get diffracted into the waveguide and propagate to the righthand side and those on the lefthand side of get diffracted into the waveguide and propagate toward the lefthand side. We fix .
One of the most serious challenges in AR/VR is a fullcolor solution with a large overall FoV. Several fullcolor waveguide solutions have been developed for light incoupling into the optical device [1]. In order to provide the transmission of multiple RGB wavelengths with a large FoV, we can fabricate a multiwaveguide solution combining stacked waveguides, each optimized for a different color. Reducing the number of waveguides while keeping the largest possible FoV allowed by the parameters of the waveguide material is the key challenge since it miniaturizes and simplifies the system. For creating a waveguide display system, we must take into account that the EPE component sets a limitation on the vertical FoV [20]. The main role of EPE component is to deviate a wide optical beam and duplicate a single pupil into many. The EPE gratings are TIR diffraction gratings in conical mounting [19,21]. As it will be demonstrated below, the design of the EPE component requires a careful calculation of the grating's pitch in order to optimize it for the best possible vertical FoV.
Our singlewaveguide fullcolor solutions for symmetrical and nonsymmetrical incouplers providing high incoupled efficiency across a wide angular range are presented in Section 2. The proposed designs are based on metagrating solutions that operate to combine the beams diffracted by combinations of the reflective and/or transmissive gratings. Considered metagratings consist of a periodic arrangement of high refractive index subwavelength elements. In Section 3 we show a new EPE component which can be compatible with the fullcolor incoupler. The main findings are summarized in the conclusion section.
Fig. 1 Schematic of dualmode diffraction grating design with overlap of incident rays. 
2 Overview of the incoupling structures
In this section we describe single waveguide dual and singlemode metagrating systems for incoupling light into an optical device. Constitutive parts of proposed metagrating solutions are different diffraction gratings having different periods calculated for the proper wavelength and may have different size and material of the elements. The geometrical structures of the elements are configured to emphasize edgewaves (EWs) [13] diffracted by the vertical edges of the highrefractive index elements. Schematic crosssectional views of a waveguide with 3 types of metagrating incouplers inside and outside the waveguide are presented in Figure 2.
Fig. 2 Schematic side view of the singlewaveguide full color system for light incoupling into the optical device: (a) dualmode embedded metagrating solution; (b) singlemode embedded metagrating solution; (c) singlemode transmissive metasurface. 
2.1 Dualmode metagrating solution
First proposed design (see Fig. 2a) is based on a dualmode metagrating solution inside a waveguide that operates to combine the beams diffracted by the reflective grating on the top of metagrating system and transmissive diffraction grating at the bottom of the system. To calculate the periods of both gratings, we assume that the largest angular span that can be coupled propagates into the waveguide between TIR and a grazing angular limit.
In Figure 3 we have schematically depicted the angular distribution of the incident and diffracted angles for the three colors. The pitch size of the reflective diffraction grating d_{1} should be selected for blue color wavelength and an angular range covering full FoV allowed by the parameters of the waveguide. We assume that the rays incident on the incoupler with angles get diffracted inside the waveguide with critical angles , while those with angles in the vicinity of the normal get diffracted with grazing angles , respectively (see Fig. 3a). We fix . The total allowed horizontal FoV for the symmetrical, dualmode system could be determined as:(1)where n_{2} is the refractive index of the waveguide. For the wavelengths corresponding to the green and red colors we observe a shift of incoupled angular distribution toward the higher angles of incidence (see Fig. 3b,c). For both colors, the angular range [; ] transmits through the first reflective diffraction grating with a very high efficiency for 0th transmitted order. This portion of incident image will be diffracted by the second transmissive grating which is on the bottom of metagrating composition. The second diffraction grating is different from the first one in that it has a different pitch size, but the geometrical structure can be of the same shape. The pitch size d_{2} of reflective diffraction grating should be calculated for the red color wavelength and an angular range covering full FoV for the transmissive diffraction grating, also assuming that the rays diffracting into the grazing direction into the waveguide (the grazing rays) are hitting the grating in the vicinity of the normal. This diffraction grating should be also optimized to get high diffraction efficiency of incoupled orders in the mentioned angular range at the red color wavelength. At the wavelength corresponding to the green color, we will observe a shift of an angular distribution toward the lower angles of incidence leading to the angular overlapping of corresponding positive/negative diffraction orders.
Using the system of diffraction grating equation we get the equations for the periods of reflective and transmissive diffraction gratings which can be presented in such form:(2) (3)
Here n_{1} is the index of the surrounding media.
The general topology of the proposed metagrating unit cell is illustrated in Figure 4a. To estimate the effectiveness of the full system, we consider the unit cell comprising four elements with refractive index n_{4} and three elements with refractive index n_{3}. As a result, the period of the metagrating is equal to d = 4d_{1 }= 3d_{2}. If the period of reflective diffraction grating is defined to incouple diffraction order M_{R} and the period of transmissive diffraction grating is defined to incouple diffraction order M_{T}, then the period of the new metagrating is defined to incouple reflected order M_{R}* = 4M_{R} and transmitted order M_{T}* = 3M_{T}. The crosssectional view of metagrating unit cell corresponds to high refractive index (n_{4}) elements on the bottom of a homogeneous dielectric plate with refractive index n_{2} (n_{4} > n_{2}). We define d_{1} as the period of this first grating, w_{1} and h_{1} are the width and height of the high refractive index elements. The second part of the proposed metagrating contains high refractive index (n_{3}) elements on top of a homogeneous dielectric plate with a refractive index n_{2} (n_{3} > n_{2}). We assume that d_{2} is the period of the second grating, w_{2} and h_{2} are the width and height of the high refractive index element. To get the unit cell of diffraction metagrating we combine two plates with first (DG1) and second (DG2) diffraction gratings. The distance between the substrate surfaces is equal to h_{1} + h_{2} + h_{a}, where h_{a} is the vertical distance between the elements of DG1 and DG2. The volume between the elements of the two gratings and substrate surfaces may be empty or may be filled by a material with low refractive index n_{1} (n_{1}<n_{2}). Here, we assume this material is air. The materials and size of the constitutive parts of the diffraction grating elements can be optimized to manage the position, direction, phase, and amplitude of the EWs diffracted by the elements [13].
A linearly polarized plane wave is incident on the metagrating system from the top in a plane perpendicular to the metagrating. We must note that the proposed solution applies for TE and TM polarizations. However, to get the maximal efficiency, the system should be optimized considering the polarization of the incident wave.
The proposed topology applies to a dual symmetrical diffraction grating system where the pupil is split angularly. To provide total reflection of the diffracted light only by the external (horizontal) walls of the waveguide, a thin layer of thickness h_{1} + h_{2} + h_{a} and with refractive index n_{2} may be positioned between the plates with the diffraction gratings.
Selecting the reflective (DG1) and transmissive parts (DG2) of the metagrating to incouple first diffraction orders (M_{R} = M_{T} = 1) results in a metagrating in which the fourth reflected order R_{±4} (M_{R}* = 4) and the third transmitted order T_{±3} (M_{T}* = 3) will be incoupled into the waveguide (see Fig. 4b). To prevent undesirable diffraction of reflected R_{±4} and transmitted T_{±3} orders, the lateral size of the metagrating may be considered in the selection of the width of the plates as well as the thicknesses of the first and second plate, with reflection and transmission gratings.
Assuming that the refractive index of the waveguide material is n_{2} ≈ 1.76 and some angles are overlapped near normal incidence in symmetric diffraction directions, to avoid missing display information for some colors [13], we obtain an overall horizontal FoV of 89° for the proposed solution.
Figure 4 illustrates diffraction performance of a metagrating using the unit cell with the following parameters: w_{1} = 100 nm, h_{1} = 240 nm, w_{2} = 80 nm; h_{2} = 100 nm, h_{a} = 250 nm. They show the computed transmittance and reflectance of TEpolarized incident wave for blue (λ_{blue} = 460 nm), green (λ_{green}^{ }= 530 nm) and red light (λ_{red} = 620 nm) by the metagrating with the period d = 1082.2 nm and n_{2} ≈ 1.76. For the system design, Aluminum arsenide (AlAs) was used as material for the elements of the reflective part (elements with refractive index n_{4}), Silicon (Si) was the material for the elements for the transmissive part (elements with refractive index n_{3}). The distance between the elements of gratings was filled by air. To increase diffraction uniformity for the light transmitted through the metagrating, the system uses a phasemodifying layer and a stop layer below the elements of second diffraction grating [13]. The high refractive index phase modifying layer is placed on the top of substrate with refractive index n_{2}. To simplify the fabrication process and control the depth in the etching process, a stop layer is placed between the elements with high refractive index and phasemodifying layer. For the simulations presented in Figure 5, TiO_{2} has been used as the material of phasemodifying layer and Al_{2}O_{3} has been used as the stoplayer material. Thickness of additional layers was 10 nm. The presented data were obtained using COMSOL Multiphysics software. Fullwave electromagnetic analysis was done for an infinite array of the unit cells presented in Figure 4a. We assumed that the system is also infinite in the Ydirection. The angular range presented in Figure 5 corresponds to an incidence from the medium with refractive index n_{2}. It can be seen, that the presented metagrating design is configured to incouple ±4th reflective diffraction orders and ±3rd transmissive diffraction orders for TE polarization. For the proposed solution we can achieve an average diffraction efficiency of 50% for blue color, of 65% for green and of 70% for red over a FoV of 89°. Let us note that the mutual positioning of the elements of 2 diffraction gratings in relation to one another inside the pitch does not affect the system performance.
Let us note that the incoupling metagrating is transparent for real image and can be also used for outcoupling purposes. The outcoupling grating can be similar to or the same as the incoupler but reversed topdown to reflect blue and transmit red light. Such an outcoupler will be able also reflect and transmit green. Because the grating is embedded into the waveguide, this metagrating is protected from mechanical damage and degradation.
Fig. 3 Schematics of a single waveguide system with dualmode embedded metagrating solution illustrating angles of incident and diffracted light for reflective and transmissive diffraction gratings for three different colors: (a) blue, (b) green, (c) red. Angles denoted using θ are located in the air. Angles denoted using Φ are located in the waveguides and measure the angle of rays that have been diffracted. Superscript C indicates a critical ray (just at the TIR limit in the waveguide), either in air or in the waveguide. Superscript G indicates a grazing ray (the highest allowed angle of incidence in the waveguide). 
Fig. 4 (a) Crosssectional view of the unit cell of metagrating; (b) geometry and distribution of diffraction order propagation. In this example use of a metagrating, the fourth reflected order R_{±4} (M_{R}*=4) and third transmitted order T_{±3} (M_{T}*=3) will be incoupled into the waveguide. 
Fig. 5 Diffraction performance of the AlAs/Si metagrating for (a) blue, (b) green and (c) red light. The angular ranges incoupled by the system are shaded. The angular ranges correspond to an incidence from the medium with refractive index n_{2.} 
2.2 Singlemode metagrating solution
Very high FoV systems are considered for high end XR and entertainment use cases. For some AR use cases such as smart glasses, targeted FoV is much lower and should lead to less complex system design. Therefore a singlesided diffraction might be sufficient.
In this section we will describe a new embedded RGB singlesided metagrating based on high refractive index material transmissive and reflective diffraction gratings with nonsymmetrical topology. We will show that this topology can increase the diffraction efficiency and diffraction uniformity of the grating. To get onaxis or offaxis incoupling for the desired FoV of the device, only one single diffraction mode is used to carry the image. Using a waveguide display system with single nonsymmetrical incoupling grating, we reduce the FoV but simplify the full system configuration.
The general topology of an asymmetrical element of a transmissive diffraction grating unit cell is illustrated in Figure 6. This crosssectional view corresponds to the high refractive index (n_{2} and n_{4}, where n_{2} could be equal to n_{4}) elements on the top of homogeneous dielectric plate with a refractive index n_{3} (n_{2,4} > n_{3} ), w_{1} and h_{1} are width and height of the high refractive index elements outside the substrate in host medium with refractive index n_{1}, w_{2} and h_{2} are width and height of the high refractive index elements inside the layer with the refractive index n_{5} (n_{1} < n_{5} < n_{3}). Parameter d_{r} describes the mutual position of the top and bottom elements in the grating. It corresponds to the distance between the right vertical edge of the bottom element and left vertical edge of the top element. For negative values of d_{r}, the top element is shifted toward the left with respect to the vertical line corresponding to the position of the right vertical edge of the bottom element. For positive values of d_{r}, the top element is shifted toward the right. The period of the diffraction grating is d. We assume that a linearly polarized plane wave illuminates the grating from the top in a plane perpendicular to the grating.
To improve the uniformity and additionally increase the transmittivity of the incoupled diffraction order, we propose to use a phase modifying layer [13] with thickness H_{L1} and refractive index n_{L1} placed between the high refractive index elements on the top of the layer with refractive index n_{5} and embedded element with refractive index n_{4}. The utilization of an additional high refractive index layer between the top and bottom elements of diffraction grating modifies the phase of refracted edge wave providing higher transmissivity of an incoupled order. To simplify the fabrication process, we can include a stop layer between this thin layer and top element of the grating. n_{L2} is the stop layer material refractive index and H_{L2} is the thickness of this layer. To control the etching depth of material with refractive index n_{5}, we can also use a second stop layer with refractive index n_{L3} (n_{L3} could be equal to n_{L2}) and the thickness of this layer H_{L3}.
This nonsymmetrical topology provides the generation of EWs, originating from the edges of the system, contributing to the formation of a final wavefront deflected from the direction of refracted wave [13]. The characteristics of the generated EWs, obtained due to the interference of the EW with the refracted plane wave, are affected by the parameters of the corresponding parts of the nonsymmetrical system, such as refractive index ratios between the dielectric materials forming the system, dimensions of the elements with higher refractive index, and angle of incidence of an incident wave.
Let us consider the performance of a diffraction grating based on the asymmetric high refractive index material elements. As it was mentioned before, the nonsymmetrical diffraction gratings achieve an asymmetrical distribution of diffracted light efficiency. For the simulated case we assume that the first diffraction order is incoupled into the waveguide. So, it is desirable for the maximal input for a single mode system to correspond to the diffraction order +1. The computed reflectance and transmittance for TE incidence at λ = 625 nm for a grating with the substrate with n_{3} = 1.7 and with the period d = 463 nm is plotted in Figure 6b. We use TiO_{2} as the material of the elements of the grating and phase modifying layer and SiO_{2} as the host medium for the second embedded element of the grating. Al_{2}O_{3} is used as the material of the stop layer. Fullwave electromagnetic analysis was done for a onedimensional periodic array of the elements. We assume that the system is infinite in X and Ydirections. Such high refractive index material diffraction grating has very high efficiency for transmitted first order. The maximal efficiency for this case is equal to η^{ }_{max}= 75%. In order to give a measure for the homogeneity of the diffraction efficiency for all angles of incidence incoupled into the waveguide, the diffraction uniformity may be represented as:(4)where η_{max,min} are correspondingly maximal and minimal transmitted efficiency. It was obtained that for considered nonsymmetric high refractive index material diffraction grating over a wide angular range (38°) the diffraction uniformity is about 97.3%.
It was demonstrated that similar topology can be used for fabrication of a reflective diffraction grating with high diffraction uniformity and efficiency for incoupled diffraction orders. To provide a full RGB single waveguide system, we can employ a metagrating inside the waveguide, which will be based on single mode asymmetric reflective and transmissive diffraction gratings described above.
For a new type of metagrating incoupler the configuration may be performed as follows. For the first reflective diffraction grating DG1 (with the period d_{1}, top of metagrating composition), the period of the reflective diffraction grating DG1 may be calculated to incouple blue and green color wavelengths in the angular range covering the desired FoV of the device for these two colors, assuming that for blue color the incoming rays with critical angle of incidence are in the vicinity of the lower boundary of the FoV () and for green color the incoming grazing rays are in the vicinity of upper boundary of the FoV (), where angles θ_{m} and θ_{M} correspond to the lower and upper boundaries of the desired field of view of the proposed device. The diffraction grating may be configured to get high diffraction efficiency of corresponding orders M_{R} in the mentioned angular range at blue and green color wavelengths. From Figure 7a corresponding to the blue color, the angular range [; ] diffracts inside the waveguide into the angular range [; ]. Using the system of diffraction grating equations we can select the pitch of first diffraction grating and estimate a minimal refractive index of the waveguide at green color wavelength (n_{3G}) incoupling both colors:(5)
To get this equation we assumed that ≈ 90°,γ _{m} is minimal differences between theoretically possible value of incoupled incident angle and the required incident angle.
At the wavelength corresponding to green color, we will observe the shift of an angular distribution toward the lower angles of an incidence. As seen in Figure 7b, at green color wavelength the angular range [; ] diffracts inside of the waveguide into the angular range [; ]. Similar functionality will be observed at the wavelength corresponding to red color. Increasing the wavelength, we obtain an additional shift of angular distribution toward the lower angles of incidence. As seen in Figure 7c, angles above transmit through the reflective diffraction grating (it corresponds to the 0 transmitted order T_{0}) with a high efficiency. This portion of incident image will be also diffracted by transmissive grating DG2, and after it can be combined with the portion of image reflected by the first grating DG1.
The second transmissive diffraction grating DG2 (with the period d_{2}, bottom of metagrating composition) may be configured as follows. The period of transmissive diffraction grating DG2 must be calculated for red color wavelength and an angular range covering the portion of FoV which was not incoupled by the first grating. Assuming that ≈ ≈ 90°, we get(6)where corresponds to the diffraction order of the second diffraction grating in the example metagrating, n_{3R} is a refractive index of the waveguide at red color wavelength, Δθ is angular overlapping for the grazing incident rays incoupling by the reflective grating and grazing incident rays incoupling by the transmissive grating ( ).
It was demonstrated that to incouple all three colors the gratings with substantially equal periods may be combined. For example, the period of the metagrating may be equal to d = d_{1 }= d_{2}. If the period of the reflective diffraction grating is defined to incouple diffraction order M_{R} and the period of the transmissive diffraction grating is defined to incouple diffraction order M_{T}, the period of new metagrating is defined to incouple reflected order M_{R}* = M_{R} and transmitted order M_{T}* = M_{T}.
An example topology of the unit cell of a metagrating is illustrated in Figure 8a. To get the unit cell of an example diffraction metagrating, we combine two plates with first (DG1) and second (DG2) diffraction gratings. The distance between the plates/substrates may be represented as H_{1} + H’_{1} + H_{a}, where H_{a} is the distance between the elements. It must be filled by a material with low refractive index n_{1} (n_{1} < n_{3}).
The mutual positioning of the elements of the two diffraction gratings in relation to one another inside the pitch does not affect the system performance, the proposed system is not sensitive to lateral shifts. Configuring the reflective and transmissive parts of a metagrating to incouple fist diffraction orders (M_{R} = M_{T} = 1) results in a metagrating for which the first reflected order R_{1} (M_{R}* = 1) and 1st transmitted order T_{1} (M_{T}* = 1) will be incoupled into the waveguide. The distribution of the diffracted light inside the waveguide is illustrated schematically in Figure 8b. To prevent undesirable back reflection, it is desirable to consider the lateral size of the metagrating and the thicknesses of the waveguide.
Below we present results of numerical simulations for the metagrating with a high refractive index configured to incouple the first reflective diffraction order and first transmissive diffraction order for TE polarization. The simulated system has been configured using TiO_{2} as the material of the elemets of DG1 and DG2 and sapphire (Al_{2}O_{3}) as the material of the substrate and stop layers. For the simulated embodiment, half of the elements of DG1 and DG2 are embedded in a homogeneous dielectric host medium with a refractive index n_{5 }= n’_{5}. The host medium was SiO_{2} material. The presented numerical simulations take into account the dispersion of materials. Figure 9 illustrates diffraction performance of a TiO_{2} metagrating (the unit cell is depicted in Fig. 8a) with the following parameters: w_{1} = w_{2} = 80 nm, h_{1} = 90 nm, h_{2} = 80 nm, w’_{1} = w’_{2} = 120 nm, h’_{1} = h’_{2} = 160 nm, H’_{L2 }= H_{L2 }= 5 nm, d’_{r }= 30 nm, H_{a }= 170 nm. Figures 9a, 9b and 9c shows the performance with blue (460 nm), green (530 nm) and red light (620 nm), respectively. The required angular ranges incoupled by the system are shaded. We have calculated that for onaxis incoupling d = 358.69 nm, M_{R}* = 1, and M_{T}* = 1. The desired symmetrical FoV is equal to 30°. Some angles are overlapped to avoid missing display information for some colors [13]. Such a system achieves the desired FoV for all 3 colors using just one waveguide. For the proposed solution for blue and red colors, we can achieve a diffraction efficiency corresponding to 45–85%, and an efficiency about 45–80% for green over a FoV of 30°. In systems in which the index of refraction of the waveguide is increased, it is possible to improve the uniformity of transmitted orders by choosing the angular ranges with more uniform distribution for each diffractive grating.
Fig. 6 (a) Crosssectional view of transmissive grating unit cell; (b) reflectance and transmittance vs. angle of TEpolarized electromagnetic wave incidence α at λ = 625 nm, n_{1 }= 1.0, n_{2} = n_{4 }= n_{L1} =2.5884, n_{3} =1.7, n_{L2} =1.7663, n_{5} = 1.4572 for TiO_{2} transmissive grating with such parameters: w_{1} = 60 nm, w_{2} =120 nm, h_{1} = 170 nm, h_{2} = 130 nm, H_{L3} = 0 nm, d_{r}=5 nm, H_{L1} = H_{L2 }= 5 nm. 
Fig. 7 Schematic side view of a single waveguide system with symmetrical field of view for three different colors: (a) blue, (b) green, (c) red. 
Fig. 8 (a) Crosssection views of the unit cell of the metagrating. (b) Schematic side view illustrating geometry and distribution of diffraction order propagation of an example metagrating. 
Fig. 9 Diffraction performance of the TiO_{2} metagrating for (a) blue, (b) green and (c) red light. The angular ranges incoupled by the system are shaded. The incidence angles correspond to the incidence from the medium with refractive index n_{3} (waveguide material). 
2.3 Singlemode transmissive metasurface
Third proposed design provides a full RGB single waveguide system based on a singlemode transmissive metasurface. In comparison with the case described in Section 2.2, the fabrication process will avoid the bonding of 2 plates. The proposed system can be also configured to get on and offaxis incoupling for the desired FoV of the device. The configuration is selected to create transmissive metasurface incouplers based on combination of transmissive diffraction gratings providing nonsymmetrical response. Constitutive parts of the example metasurface are nonsymmetrical transmissive diffraction gratings described in Section 2.2 (see Fig. 6a). The second transmissive diffraction grating is different from the first one in that it has a different pitch size, but the geometrical structure is of the same shape. The equations for the period of two transmissive diffraction gratings can be presented in such form:(7)where , correspond to the diffraction orders of the first and second diffraction gratings of the metasurface, is chosen approximately equal to 75°−90°.
To estimate the effectiveness of the full system, a metasurface was simulated with a unit cell comprising three elements of DG1 and two elements of DG2. In the example, the period of the metasurface is equal to d = 3d_{1} = 2d_{2}. In a case where the period of the diffraction grating DG1 is selected to incouple diffraction order M_{1T} and the period of transmissive diffraction grating DG2 is selected to incouple diffraction order M_{2T}, the period of the resulting metasurface is defined to incouple transmitted order M_{1T}* = 3M_{1T} and transmitted order M_{2T}* = 2M_{2T}. Configuring the constitutive parts of a metasurface to incouple fist diffraction orders (M_{1T} = M_{2T} = 1) results in a metasurface for which the third transmitted order T_{3} (M_{1T}* = 3) and second transmitted order T_{2} (M_{2T}* = 2) will be incoupled into the waveguide.
As an example, consider a transmissive metasurface on the top of the waveguide with a unit cell presented in Figure 10. This crosssectional view may correspond to the high refractive index (n_{2} and n_{4}) elements of the first diffraction grating (DG1) and to the high refractive index (n’_{2} and n’_{4}) elements of the second diffraction grating (DG2). In this example, the metasurface is placed on a homogeneous dielectric plate with a refractive index n_{3} (n_{2,4} and n’_{2,4} > n_{3}). The space between two gratings is filled up by the material with refractive index n_{6}. In this example, the distance between the two gratings is equal to H_{a}. To improve the uniformity of transmitted diffraction orders and additionally increase the transmittivity of incoupled diffraction order, we consider phase modifying layers with the thickness H_{L2} and H’_{L1} and refractive indexes n_{L2} and n’_{L1} placed between the high refractive index elements of the gratings. To simplify the fabrication process, we use socalled stop layers between this thin layer and top elements of the gratings. In this example, n_{L1} and n’_{L2} are the stop layer material refractive indexes, and H_{L1} and H’_{L2} are the thicknesses of these layers.
The angular distribution of the diffracted light inside the waveguide is presented in Figure 11. The schematics in Figure 11 illustrate the angular space for each color (starting from the blue color). For blue color (Fig. 11a) the coupled portion of light corresponds to the 3rd transmitted order. For green and red colors (Fig. 11b, c), the illustration shows the portion of light coupled by this waveguide corresponding to the third and second transmitted orders of the metasurface.
Below is presented a set of numerical simulations for an example transmissive metasurface with a high refractive index configured to incouple 2nd and 3rd transmissive diffraction orders for TE polarization. Figure 12 illustrates simulated diffraction performance of the TiO_{2}/AlAs transmissive metasurface using the unit cell depicted in Figure 10 with the following parameters: d = 980 nm, w_{1} = 80 nm, w_{2} = 100 nm, h_{1} = h_{2} = 100 nm, H_{L1} = 5 nm, H_{L2} = 0 nm, w’_{1} = 60 nm, w’_{2} = 80 nm, h’_{1} = 180 nm, h’_{2} = 200 nm, H’_{L1} = 0 nm, H’_{L2} = 0 nm, d_{r} = –30 nm, d’_{r} = 10 nm, H_{a} = 110 nm. Sapphire is the material of the waveguide. The FoV extends between −15° and +15° for a total FoV of 30°. For the simulation, n_{1} = 1 (air), n_{2} = n_{4} and this refractive index corresponds to TiO_{2}, n’_{2 }= n’_{4} and this refractive index corresponds to AlAs, n_{5} = n’_{1} and it is SiO_{2} material, n_{3} = n_{L1} = n’_{5} = n_{6} and it is the material of a waveguide (Al_{2}O_{3}).
It was obtained that for the blue color we can get about 25–65% of an average diffracted efficiency, for the green color we can achieve a diffraction efficiency corresponding to 20–45%, and of about 30–75% for the red.
Fig. 10 Crosssectional view of the unit cell of the metasurface on top of the waveguide. 
Fig. 11 Schematics of a single waveguide system with metasurface solution illustrating angles of incident and diffracted light for transmissive diffraction gratings for three different colors: (a) blue, (b) green, (c) red. 
Fig. 12 Diffraction performance of the TiO_{2}/AlAs transmissive metasurface using the unit cell depicted in Figure 10 for an example set of parameters for (a) blue, (b) green and (c) red light. 
3 Full color eyepupilexpander
In this section we describe a new fullcolor EPE component which is compatible with dualmode metagrating incoupler.
In Figure 13a we schematically present the full system architecture based on dualmode metagrating elements embedded inside the waveguide. We assume that each metagrating element represents a combination of two diffraction gratings oriented at some specific angle. We define that both incoupling gratings have the same orientation (Φ_{inc} = 90°). They diffract the positive order toward the lefthand side of the figure and the negative order toward the righthand side. Then we have two similar EPE metagratings oriented symmetrically w.r.t. the yaxis. Each EPE metagrating includes two diffraction gratings which can have different orientation. The EPE metagratings diffract zero orders to expand the pupil horizontally, and nonzero order to deviate the image along the yaxis. For this architecture the outcoupling grating also expands the pupil in the vertical direction.
Let us calculate the pitches of the EPE and outcoupling gratings for one waveguide full color system. To determine the desired grating periods of the EPE and outcoupling gratings, we start with the basic equation for a diffraction grating in conical mounting. The wellknown grating equations for the EPE diffraction gratings can be written as:(8)
Here, θ_{d} is the incident polar angle diffracted by the incoupling grating; θ_{e} is the polar angle diffracted by the EPE grating for diffraction order N of EPE grating; φ_{d} and φ_{e} are incident (angle diffracted by the incoupling grating) and diffracted azimuth angles, d_{epe} is the period of EPE diffraction grating, Φ_{epe} is the EPE diffraction grating orientation angle. Let us remind that, the deviating EPE grating will limit the vertical FoV of the total system [20]. This limitation is connected with the fact, that the diffracted angles θ_{e} must be also kept above the TIR limit angle. This fact must be precisely analyzed for the full color system solution.
The outcoupling system is described by such system of diffraction grating equations:(9)where θ_{o} is the polar angle diffracted by the outcoupling grating for diffraction order L of this grating; φ_{o} is diffracted azimuth angle, d_{out} is the period of outcoupling diffraction grating, Φ_{out} is the grating orientation angle.
Based on the general analysis of distortion free condition for the grating vectors of the system and assuming that Φ_{inc} = 90° we get(10)
Equations (10) are the formulas connecting pitches of EPE and outcoupler with the period of incoupler and parameters of full waveguide system.
Our solution corresponds to the combination of 2 EPE gratings DG3 and DG4 embedded into the waveguide. Such combination of EPE diffractive gratings can be considered as EPE metagrating solution MG2 (see Fig. 13a for full system design). To get the pitches of the constitutive parts of such EPE metagrating (d_{epe1,epe2}) we can also use equation (9) assuming that the pitches of incoupling system d_{inc1,inc2} are calculated using the equations (2) and (3). To avoid undesirable mutual effect of the grating combination we must properly optimize the distance between the elements of these gratings. For the optimizations proposed below we assume that this distance could be above one wavelength.
To get the EPE metagrating MG2 we combine two plates with first EPE (DG3) and second EPE (DG4) diffraction gratings. We assume that the distance between the plates/substrates is equal to h*_{1} + h*_{2} + h*_{a}, where h*_{a} is the distance between the elements, and h*_{1} and h*_{2} are the heights of the gratings (see Fig. 13b). This distance between the elements of two gratings and substrates is fulfilled by the material with low refractive index n_{1}.
Table 1 shows the parameters of the full system including the periods of outcoupling gratings DG7 and DG8. We assume that the EPE gratings are oriented differently. Orientation of the EPE gratings DG3 and DG4 were optimized to get maximal vertical FoV of the full system.
Analyzing the parameters of this full system, we demonstrate that for such a system horizontal FoV is equal to ΔQ^{ʜ} = 74.6°. Analyzing the system of grating equations, we get that for blue and red color vertical FoV is equal to ΔQ^{V} = 40°. Taking into account that at green color wavelength full angular range will be split between the gratings DG1 and DG2, we must check the outcoupled angular bandpasses at green color. Numerical analysis of the possible horizontal and vertical FoVs for this system of metagratings is presented in Figure 14. In this figure the angular ranges kept above the TIR limit angle and below the grazing limit for corresponding polar angles before and after EPE are marked by yellow. Due to the EPE gratings' limitation of vertical FoV at green color wavelength the full vertical FoV of the system will be decreased to ΔQ^{V} = 24°.
To duplicate a single pupil into many, each EPE grating in MG2 and MG2' combination represents a combination of multiple subgratings with the same pitch but different diffraction efficiency changing gradually from minimal value to maximal (see Fig. 15a). The general topology of the unit cell of symmetrical reflective diffraction subgrating is illustrated in Figure 15b. This crosssection view may correspond to a high refractive index (n_{3}) element on the bottom of a homogeneous dielectric media with a refractive index n_{2} (n_{3} > n_{2} ). Here we assume that all EPE gratings have the same structure and materials. But in general case the structure and high index material for the gratings can be different. The high refractive index element is covered by the material with lower refractive index n_{4} (n_{3} > n_{4} ). The full system is hosted by the homogeneous host medium with refractive index n_{1}. It is assumed that n_{1}<n_{2} and n_{1}<n_{4}. W and H are the width and height of the high refractive index element (in general case the parameters of the high index elements for DG3 and DG4 are different). H_{1} is the thickness of the layer with refractive index n_{5}.
Fig. 13 (a) Perspective view of the full color waveguide having dualmode metagrating incoupler (MG1), EPE system (MG2 and MG2') and outcoupling grating system (MG3 and MG3'); (b) Side view of a waveguide showing internal EPE metagrating MG2. 
Parameters of the fullcolor system of metagratings.
Fig. 14 Possible FoV for the system of metagratings. Parameters of the diffraction gratings are presented in Table 1. Simulations corresponds to the systems (a) DG1+DG3+DG7 and (b) DG2+DG4+DG8 at green color wavelength. In the pictures (a)(b) top left: Angular bandpass before incoupler; top right: Angular bandpass before EPE; bottom left: Angular bandpass before outcoupler; bottom right: Angular bandpass after outcoupler;yellow band: Proper angular bandpass after diffraction; green band: Nonproper angular bandpass after diffraction; purple band: Bandpass impossible for diffraction. 
Fig. 15 (a) Single EPE grating including several subgratings; (b) crosssectional view of reflective subgrating unit cell. 
4 Conclusion
New types of full color single waveguide solutions are presented in this work. Applying our new grating combination solutions for single and dualmode incouplers, we can modify the total incoupled FoV of the system. For the case of limited FoV of the device, we can use singlemode grating simplifying the system configuration. We have demonstrated that singlemode embedded metagrating solution and singlemode transmissive metasurface provides high diffraction uniformity and efficiency of incoupled light for horizontal FoV of about 30° for three RGB colors and a wafer with a refractive index of 1.76. Our full system can be optimized to get on and offaxis incoupling for the required FoV of the device. To achieve high FoV, we use the pupil tiling property of the grating. To develop a waveguide display system with a wide FoV, we can combine two singlemode metagratings optimized for offaxis incoupling or we can use dualmode metagrating solution. It was demonstrated that for the waveguide material with refractive index 1.76 (Al_{2}O_{3}), we can get an overall horizontal FoV of 89° for three colors.
A new type of fullcolor EPE metagrating component which is compatible with dualmode metagrating incoupler is analyzed. It is demonstrated that by orienting EPE gratings differently we can increase the vertical FoV of the full system getting an overall vertical FoV of 24° for three colors.
Applying our new solutions, we can provide good gathering of diffracted rays for the different colors. These new metagratings are also protected from mechanical damage and degradation.
In collaboration with the French company Vmicro (Lille, France), we have started the analysis of the fabrication steps of a prototype of a dualmode embedded metagrating solution. At the moment we have fabricated by ebeam lithography a Sibased transmissive diffractive grating which can be used as the transmissive part (grating DG2 in Fig. 4a) of the incoupling metagrating solution. For the system design, we selected Al_{2}O_{3} as the material of substrate. To control the etching depth of Si, we used an additional thin (10 nm) layer of TiO_{2} placed on the top of substrate. We must take into account that the fabrication process will be affected by the exact shape and size of the plates placed between the constitutive parts of the waveguide with the gratings DG1 and DG2. We also remind that our analysis demonstrated that the mutual positioning of the elements of these 2 gratings in relation to one another inside the unit cell does not affect the system performance. This fact will also simplify the fabrication.
References
 B.C. Kress, I. Chatterjee, Nanophotonics 10, 41 (2021) [Google Scholar]
 T. Zhan et al., iScience 23, 101397 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 K. Yin et al., J. Phys. Photonics 3, 022010 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J.Y. Hong et al., Sci. Rep. 7, 2753 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 J.H. Park, S.B. Kim, Opt. Express 26, 27076 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 G. Li et al., Opt. Lett. 41, 2486 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 G.Y. Lee et al., Nat. Commun. 9, 4562 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 M.L. Brongersma, Proc. SPIE 11080, 110800R (2019) [Google Scholar]
 Z. Shi, W.T. Chen, F. Capasso, Proc. SPIE 10676, 1067615 (2018) [Google Scholar]
 J. Yang et al., Opt. Lett. 41, 5426 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 D. Cheng et al., Opt. Express 22, 20705 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 T. Levola, P. Laakkonen, Opt. Express 15, 2067 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 V. Drazic et al., Proc. SPIE 11765, 11765A (2021) [Google Scholar]
 H. Mukawa et al., J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 17, 185 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 C. Chang et al., Optica 7, 1563 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 O. Shramkova et al., Proc. SPIE 11802, 118020D (2021) [Google Scholar]
 M.A. Mattelin, Opt. Express 8, 11175 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 B. Bai et al., Appl. Opt. 49, 5454 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 C.P. Chen et al., Displays 67, 101998 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 V. Drazic, L. Blonde, O. Shramkova, Patent application WO2021 14 4452A1 [Google Scholar]
 Yu. Liu et al., Proc. SPIE 9449, 944914 (2014) [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: Oksana Shramkova, Valter Drazic, Guillaume Bourcin, Bobin Varghese, Laurent Blondé, Valerie Allié, Metagrating solutions for full color singleplate waveguide combiner, EPJ Appl. Metamat. 9, 5 (2022)
All Tables
All Figures
Fig. 1 Schematic of dualmode diffraction grating design with overlap of incident rays. 

In the text 
Fig. 2 Schematic side view of the singlewaveguide full color system for light incoupling into the optical device: (a) dualmode embedded metagrating solution; (b) singlemode embedded metagrating solution; (c) singlemode transmissive metasurface. 

In the text 
Fig. 3 Schematics of a single waveguide system with dualmode embedded metagrating solution illustrating angles of incident and diffracted light for reflective and transmissive diffraction gratings for three different colors: (a) blue, (b) green, (c) red. Angles denoted using θ are located in the air. Angles denoted using Φ are located in the waveguides and measure the angle of rays that have been diffracted. Superscript C indicates a critical ray (just at the TIR limit in the waveguide), either in air or in the waveguide. Superscript G indicates a grazing ray (the highest allowed angle of incidence in the waveguide). 

In the text 
Fig. 4 (a) Crosssectional view of the unit cell of metagrating; (b) geometry and distribution of diffraction order propagation. In this example use of a metagrating, the fourth reflected order R_{±4} (M_{R}*=4) and third transmitted order T_{±3} (M_{T}*=3) will be incoupled into the waveguide. 

In the text 
Fig. 5 Diffraction performance of the AlAs/Si metagrating for (a) blue, (b) green and (c) red light. The angular ranges incoupled by the system are shaded. The angular ranges correspond to an incidence from the medium with refractive index n_{2.} 

In the text 
Fig. 6 (a) Crosssectional view of transmissive grating unit cell; (b) reflectance and transmittance vs. angle of TEpolarized electromagnetic wave incidence α at λ = 625 nm, n_{1 }= 1.0, n_{2} = n_{4 }= n_{L1} =2.5884, n_{3} =1.7, n_{L2} =1.7663, n_{5} = 1.4572 for TiO_{2} transmissive grating with such parameters: w_{1} = 60 nm, w_{2} =120 nm, h_{1} = 170 nm, h_{2} = 130 nm, H_{L3} = 0 nm, d_{r}=5 nm, H_{L1} = H_{L2 }= 5 nm. 

In the text 
Fig. 7 Schematic side view of a single waveguide system with symmetrical field of view for three different colors: (a) blue, (b) green, (c) red. 

In the text 
Fig. 8 (a) Crosssection views of the unit cell of the metagrating. (b) Schematic side view illustrating geometry and distribution of diffraction order propagation of an example metagrating. 

In the text 
Fig. 9 Diffraction performance of the TiO_{2} metagrating for (a) blue, (b) green and (c) red light. The angular ranges incoupled by the system are shaded. The incidence angles correspond to the incidence from the medium with refractive index n_{3} (waveguide material). 

In the text 
Fig. 10 Crosssectional view of the unit cell of the metasurface on top of the waveguide. 

In the text 
Fig. 11 Schematics of a single waveguide system with metasurface solution illustrating angles of incident and diffracted light for transmissive diffraction gratings for three different colors: (a) blue, (b) green, (c) red. 

In the text 
Fig. 12 Diffraction performance of the TiO_{2}/AlAs transmissive metasurface using the unit cell depicted in Figure 10 for an example set of parameters for (a) blue, (b) green and (c) red light. 

In the text 
Fig. 13 (a) Perspective view of the full color waveguide having dualmode metagrating incoupler (MG1), EPE system (MG2 and MG2') and outcoupling grating system (MG3 and MG3'); (b) Side view of a waveguide showing internal EPE metagrating MG2. 

In the text 
Fig. 14 Possible FoV for the system of metagratings. Parameters of the diffraction gratings are presented in Table 1. Simulations corresponds to the systems (a) DG1+DG3+DG7 and (b) DG2+DG4+DG8 at green color wavelength. In the pictures (a)(b) top left: Angular bandpass before incoupler; top right: Angular bandpass before EPE; bottom left: Angular bandpass before outcoupler; bottom right: Angular bandpass after outcoupler;yellow band: Proper angular bandpass after diffraction; green band: Nonproper angular bandpass after diffraction; purple band: Bandpass impossible for diffraction. 

In the text 
Fig. 15 (a) Single EPE grating including several subgratings; (b) crosssectional view of reflective subgrating unit cell. 

In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.