Issue 
EPJ Appl. Metamat.
Volume 5, 2018
Metamaterials Research and Development in Japan



Article Number  12  
Number of page(s)  8  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/epjam/2018009  
Published online  19 December 2018 
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjam/2018009
Research Article
Design of composite right/lefthanded transmission line for phase shifter of multiband base station antenna
^{1}
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, National Defense Academy, Yokosuka 2398686, Japan
^{2}
Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, MalaysiaJapan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
^{3}
Department of Information and Communication Systems Engineering, Chiba Institute of Technology, Narashino 2750016,
Japan
^{*} email: naobumi@nda.ac.jp
Received:
3
September
2018
Accepted:
17
November
2018
Published online: 19 December 2018
In multiband base station antennas, interference toward neighboring cells at low operating frequency increases since tilting angle is frequencyindependent and beamwidth in the vertical plane increases as decreasing the operating frequency. In this paper, the realization of the different phase shifts at each frequency is proposed by using the dispersion relation of the composite right/lefthanded transmission line. The feasibility of the phase shift is clarified by using equivalent circuit model of the unit cell. Next, the dispersion and Bloch impedance of the actual configuration of the unit cell are designed. The inverse phase shift at each frequency is verified experimentally.
© N. Michishita et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2018
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1 Introduction
In mobile communication systems, cellular configuration is commonly used [1]. In addition, due to the recent explosive increase of mobile communication traffic, multiple frequency bands have been assigned for mobile communication systems. Therefore, base station antennas for the mobile communication systems require to operate in multiple frequency bands.
The mobile base station antenna is generally composed of vertically aligned subarrays, and each subarray comprises vertically aligned several elements [2]. In the cellular system, the main beam of the base station antennas in the vertical plane is downtilted to suppress the interference toward neighboring cells [3]. The beam tilt is achieved by changing the phases of subarrays by using the phase shifter [4]. The phase shifter comprises movable dielectric plates [5] or metal strips [6], and the phase difference is achieved by changing the electrical or physical line length with shifting the dielectric plates [5] or the metal strips [6].
In the multiband base station antennas, the electromagnetic wave propagating along the transmission lines in the phase shifter is usually independent to the frequency. The excitation phase to tilt the beam is given by the multiplication of the wave number k and the length d _{ p } from the subarray to the wave front. When the transmission lines corresponding to the length d _{ p } are added in the phase shifter, since electromagnetic wave propagates along the transmission lines independently to the frequency, the tilt angles become identical over the sharing frequency bands in the multiband base station antenna. However, since the excitation phase depends on the wave number k, the excitation phase of each subarray becomes frequencydependent properties. On the other hand, the electrical array aperture of the multiband antenna decreases according to decreasing the frequency because the physical array aperture is the same. Therefore, since the beamwidth of the base station antenna increases as decreasing the frequency, the interference toward neighboring cells in lower frequency band increases. The interference can be suppressed if the tilt angle increases in low frequency. This requires nonlinear phase shift depending on the frequency in the phase shifter while the tilt angle is frequencyindependent when using a conventional phase shifter. The dispersive transmission lines are suitable for the required function.
Recently, composite right/lefthanded (CRLH) transmission line has received much attention because CRLH transmission line can achieve unnatural propagation phenomena by appropriately designing its configuration such as backward propagation [7]. By using backward propagation property of the CRLH transmission line, the phase shifters composed of coplanar waveguide with lumped element are compact in size and a linear phase response [8]. The linearly and broadband tunable performances can be achieved by using varactor diodes [9,10]. The tunable negative index materials are also composed of a periodic copper wire sandwiched between yttrium iron garnet films [11]. Another important aspect in the CRLH transmission line is the phase dispersion characteristics of CRLH transmission line. This property has been applied to frequency beam scanning leaky wave antennas [12,13]. Since the passing phase of the CRLH transmission line can be varied from backward to forward by scanning the frequency, wide beam steering can be achieved by using CRLH transmission line.
We have proposed to introduce the CRLH transmission line to the phase shifter of 1.5/2 GHz dualband base station antenna to use the phase dispersion characteristic [14]. By applying the CRLH transmission line to the phase shifter, the tilt angle can be increased in low frequency band. Since base station antennas are placed at various locations, the tilt angle has to be adjusted to suppress the interference toward the neighboring cells in each location. However, unlike the conventional beam steering leaky wave antennas using the CRLH transmission line, frequency cannot be changed to adjust the beam direction in communication systems. In our proposed phase shifter, mechanically movable patches are placed above the transmission line then metal insulator metal (MIM) capacitors are configured. The configuration has achieved to vary the phase dispersion curve.
This paper is the extension of [14] and [15] presented by authors. In this paper, the required phase shift for the proposed phase shifter is first investigated by using a typical base station antenna example. Reference [14] shows the configuration of the proposed phase shifter and simulation results of the proposed CRLH transmission line. In this paper, the requirements to design the unit cell of the CRLH transmission line are studied by using T shape 2 port network and circuit parameters for the unit cell are derived. Then, the circuit parameters of the realized unit cell structure presented in [14] are derived and the influence of the structural parameters on the circuit parameters is investigated. After that, the characteristics of a cascade structure of the designed unit cells are evaluated by the measurement and simulation. This measured and simulated results are based on [15]. The comparison between the results and 2port network analysis is also discussed and the feasibility of the proposed phase shifter is evaluated.
The organization of the paper is as follows. In Section 2, the configuration of conventional base station antenna is first shown and required phase shift for the proposed phase shifter is presented. Then, the 2 port network analysis of the unit cell is described in Section 3. The comparison of the circuit parameters between the 2 port network and the realized unit cell is discussed in Section 4. The experimental and simulation results of 5cell proposed CRLH transmission line are described in Section 5. Section 6 describes the conclusion.
2 Requirement of phase shift in base station antenna
2.1 Conventional base station antenna configuration
Figure 1 shows a typical mobile base station antenna configuration. We assume that the base station antenna operates from 1.5 GHz band to 2 GHz band and it is composed of 4 subarrays. Each subarray is composed of equispaced 4 planer dipole elements. The beam tilt can be achieved by equalizing the phases among the elements. The phase differences among the elements correspond to the distances normal to the wave front.
The feed network in each subarray is designed to achieve the beam tilt angle of θ _{ T } by changing the lengths of the transmission lines as shown in Figure 1a. The tilt angle of each subarray is generally designed at the center of the variable tilt angle range. Here, we select the element spacing in the subarray to be 0.65 wavelengths at 2 GHz, and the tilt angle θ _{ T } = 4.5° as an example [16].
In the conventional base station antenna, each subarray is excited through a variable phase shifter and cables as shown in Figure 1b. The length of the cables are all set to be identical and phase delays required for the lowerinstalled subarrays to achieve beam tilt are given by variable phase shifters. In an example of the conventional phase shifter configuration [17], the radial strip line is electromagnetically coupled to the arc strip line through the slot. The pass length of the phase shifter can be varied by changing the angle φ of the radial strip line. Since the phase velocities in the air or in the strip lines are the same in all frequencies, the tilt angles are independent to the frequencies.
Fig. 1 Configuration concept of base station antenna. (a) Subarray composed of 4 array elements. (b) Base station antenna with conventional phase shifter and (c) proposed conposite right/lefthanded phase shifter. 
2.2 Proposed phase shifter and required phase shift
Figure 2 shows the directivity difference at the above base station antenna between 1.5 and 2 GHz at the vertical angle θ, when the tilt angle θ _{ T } = 4.5°. As shown in Figure 2, the directivity difference increases as decreasing θ from 4.5°. The tilt angle θ _{ T } is usually chosen toward the cell edge direction. When assuming that the base station antenna is located at the height of 40 m, the tilt angle θ of 4.5° corresponds to the cell radius of around 500 m. The vertical angles θ of 2° and 1° correspond to the distance of about 1150 m and 2300 m from the base station, which are in the next cell and next to the next cell, respectively.
To suppress the interference toward the neighboring cells, we have proposed to give a deeper beam tilt in lower frequency by adding frequency dispersive transmission lines composed of CRLH transmission lines to the conventional phase shifter. Figure 3 shows the configuration of the proposed phase shifter. The required additive phase shift in the low frequency band is investigated here. To equalize the directivities at a specific angle θ at 1.5 and 2 GHz, the additive phase shift for 1.5 GHz is required. Therefore, directivity patterns with the additive phase shift are calculated at 1.5 GHz iteratively until the directivities at the angle θ are equalized at both the frequencies. Figure 4 shows the required maximum phase shift for 1.5 GHz to equalize the directivities toward the vertical angle θ. When equalizing the directivities toward the vertical angles θ of 2° and 1°, the beam tilt angle of 1.5 GHz must be increased by 5.38° and 5.73°. In this case, the maximum of 31.9° and 44.7° phase shift are additionally required at 1.5 GHz from the phase at the tilt angle of 4.5°, respectively.
Fig. 2 Directivity difference between 1.5 and 2 GHz. 
Fig. 3 Configuration of proposed phase shifter. 
Fig. 4 Required maximum phase shift for 1.5 GHz to equalize the directivities toward vertical angle θ. 
3 Equivalent circuit design of unit cell
This section describes the electrical design requirements for the unit cell of the CRLH transmission line. The equivalent circuit for the ideal CRLH transmission line can be shown as Figure 5. L _{ R } and C _{ R } are the series inductance and the shunt capacitance which exist in the equivalent circuit of conventional microstrip line. The series capacitance C _{ L } is provided by mainly the gap between patches. The shunt inductance L _{ L } is provided by mainly the via.
Since the proposed phase shifter operates in wide frequency range as from 1.5 to 2 GHz bands, the balanced conditions should be satisfied for achieving the stable Bloch impedance characteristics. By using the circuit parameters, the series and shunt resonant frequencies are expressed as(1) (2)
In addition, the f _{se} and f _{sh} need to be larger than the frequency of 2 GHz band because the operational frequency should not be in the bandgap region. Therefore, the first condition of the design procedure is the balanced case of f _{se} = f _{sh}, and those should be larger than the 2 GHz bands, which is more than around 2.2 GHz.
In the balanced case, the cutoff frequency can be expressed to take the simpler form(3)
The lowest frequency band, which is 1.5 GHz band here, should be above the cutoff region. Therefore, the second condition is that f _{ cL } is lower than 1.5 GHz band, which is around 1.45 GHz.
The impedance matching in the target frequencies frequency range needs to be achieved for realizing the phase shifter. In the periodic transmission line structures, the Bloch impedance is obtained from(4)where(5)
To achieve voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) is less than 2 in the considering frequenciesfrequency range, the third condition is 40 < Z _{ B } < 60 [Ω].
The phase constant is derived from (6)where p is periodic length of the unit cell. To achieve the guided wave propagation in the target frequency bands, the phase constant in the considering frequency bands should be in the slow wave region.
We estimate the phase shift that can be obtained by a unit cell composed of a CRLH transmission line at 1.5 and 2 GHz, which are considered as the representative frequencies of 1.5 and 2 GHz bands. In this investigation, the phase constants are calculated by changing C _{ L } in Equation (6). The reason of changing C _{ L } is that C _{ L } is largely influenced on the phase characteristic and it is relatively easy to change the value compared with other three parameters. The detail of the calculation is as follows.
We first determine the range of the circuit parameters satisfying the above first condition (f _{sh} and f _{se}> 2 GHz here). As the results of our preliminary investigation, the righthanded circuit parameters L _{ R } and C _{ R } are set to 4.5 nH and 0.2 pF, respectively, in this study. These values come from the final CRLH transmission line structure. The variable ranges of the lefthanded circuit parameters satisfying the first condition are 1 nH <L _{ L }< 31 nH and 0.1 pF <C _{ L }< 1.4 pF. The phase constants are calculated by using the four parameters with varying L _{ L } and C _{ L }. The phase shift is determined by the difference of the phase constant between a considering C _{ L } and C _{ L } of 0.1 pF when L _{ L } is fixed. We also define the phase shift difference (PSD). This is the key parameter of the proposed phase shifter. The PSD is the difference between the phase shift at 1.5 GHz and that at 2 GHz when the same four circuit parameters are used. Figure 6 shows the PSD between 1.5 and 2 GHz depending on C _{ L } and L _{ L }. The black area in the figure shows the area that the PSD is not available. As can be seen in Figure 6, the variable range of C _{ L } obtaining large PSD variation can be reduced when increasing L _{ L } from 1 nH to around 13 nH. As increasing L _{ L } from 13 nH, the largest PSD at the fixed L _{ L } increases and the largest PSD is maximum when L _{ L } is 19 nH. The maximum PSD is 66° at C _{ L } of 0.1 pF. When further increasing L _{ L } from 19 nH, the largest PSD at the fixed L _{ L } gradually decreases and the variable range of C _{ L } obtaining large PSD variation increases.
Figures 7 and 8 show the Bloch impedance Z _{ B } at 1.5 and 2 GHz depending on C _{ L } and L _{ L }. The area satisfying 40 < Z _{ B } < 60 at both 1.5 GHz and 2 GHz is plotted by red closed line in Figure 6. This corresponds to the second condition. When considering the second condition, the largest PSD variation can be obtained when L _{ L } is around 4 to 5 nH and C _{ L } is from 0.5 to 0.9 pF. The estimated PSD variation is around 10° to 15°.
Fig. 5 Equivalent circuit model for the ideal CRLH transmission line. 
Fig. 6 Phase shift difference between 1.5 and 2 GHz depending on C _{ L } and L _{ L }. 
Fig. 7 Bloch impedance Z _{ B } at 1.5 GHz depending on C _{ L } and L _{ L }. 
Fig. 8 Bloch impedance Z _{ B } at 2 GHz depending on C _{ L } and L _{ L }. 
4 Unit cell design
This section investigates an actual CRLH transmission line configuration. Microstrip line based CRLH transmission line is considered and mushroom configuration is applied to configure the unit cell of the CRLH transmission line. Figure 9 shows the unit cell structure of the considering CRLH transmission line. Shunt inductor L _{ L } is realized by the shorted pin and series capacitor C _{ L } is realized by the parallel plate capacitor. MIM capacitors are added by arranging the additional patches above the parallel plate capacitors. The phase characteristics are varied by sliding the patch mechanically in x direction. The crossover between the additional patch and the main patch is 50% as shown in Figure 9. The crossover of 100% corresponds to the additional patch is located directly above the main patch. The sliding range of the proposed phase shifter is defined as the range from crossover of 10% to 100%.
In this section, the influence of structural parameters on the PSD variation is investigated. We first investigate the influence of the height h and the radius r on the PSD variation. Those parameters mainly correspond to the shunt inductance L _{ L }. Figure 10 shows the PSD variation between the crossover of 10% and 100% depending on the height h and radius r of the shorted pin. The finite element method is used for the electromagnetic simulation. l _{ pp } = 2.9 mm and d = 0.30 mm in this simulation. The PSD variation is maximum when the height h is 6 mm and the radius r is 0.25 mm. The second condition (matching condition) is to satisfy the Bloch impedance in between 40 and 60 Ω, which satisfies the VSWR of less than 2 for 50 Ω. The area with the height h of around 8 mm and the radius r of 0.25 mm satisfies this condition and the PSD variation of about 10° is achieved in the area. The L _{ L } of the shorted pin is estimated from the microstrip line with shorted pin model. In other word, the parallel plate capacitor and the additional patch are removed from the unit cell model. Z parameters of the model are calculated and the L _{ L } is derived by applying Tshape twoport network to the model. The estimated L _{ L } at the height h of 6, 8, and 10 mm are 3.6, 5.0, and 6.5 nH, respectively, when the radius r is 0.25 mm. The derived L _{ L } values agree with L _{ L } estimated from the equivalent circuit.
Figure 11 shows the PSD variation between the crossover of 10% and 100% when the height of the parallel plate capacitor l _{ pp } and the thickness of the insulator of the MIM capacitor d are varied. These correspond to the series capacitance C _{ L }. The height h is 8 mm and the radius r is 0.25 mm. The PSD variation increases as decreasing l _{ pp }. The thickness d is not sensitive to the PSD variation. To satisfy second condition for the Bloch impedance, the values around l _{ pp } of 2.9 mm and d of 0.30 mm are suitable in this configuration. The C _{ L } of the parallel plate capacitor with the additional patch is also estimated from the model removing the shorted pin from the unit cell model. The estimated C _{ L } at the height l _{ pp } of 1.9, 2.9, and 3.9 mm are 0.65, 0.93, and 1.27 pF for crossover of 10% and 0.89, 1.21, and 1.65 pF for crossover of 100% respectively when the thickness d is 0.3 mm. Although the values are a little larger than the values obtaining the PSD variation of around 10° to 15° shown in Figure 6, the values fairly agree with those shown in Figure 6. Therefore, it can be said that the designed mushroom configuration can satisfy the electrical requirements for the proposed phase shifter described in Section 3.
Figure 12 shows the dispersion diagram of the unit cell after parametric study. In the proposed phase shifter, the phase difference at 1.5 GHz and 2 GHz are 16.8° and 8.5°. Thus, the phase difference at 1.5 GHz is larger than that at 2 GHz. This is because the unit cell is working in the lefthanded region. This dispersion relation cannot be achieved in the conventional transmission line. Since the final tilt angle can be achieved by the summation of the phase shifts of the conventional and proposed phase shifters, the phase shift by using the conventional phase shifter has to be designed again according to that by using the proposed phase shifter.
Fig. 9 Configuration of unit cell structure. 
Fig. 10 Phase shift difference by subtracting phase shift between crossover of 10% and 100% at 2 GHz from that at 1.5 GHz when h and r are varied. 
Fig. 11 Phase shift difference by subtracting phase shift between crossover of 10% and 100% at 2 GHz from that at 1.5 GHz when l _{ pp } and d are varied 
Fig. 12 Dispersion diagram of the unit cell with l = 8 mm, g = 0.5 mm, p = 8.5 mm, w = 3 mm, r = 0.25 mm, h = 8 mm, l _{ pp } = 2.9 mm, d = 0.3 mm. 
5 Experiments
The proposed CRLH transmission line is experimentally investigated. As described in Section 2, the required PSD variation is around 30° to 50° for a typical base station antenna. Since the unit cell of the considering structure has around 10° PSD variation, cascade structure should be required for the phase shifter. In this study, 5cell structure is fabricated, which corresponds to equalize the directivity of a base station antenna between 1.5 and 2 GHz toward the vertical angle of about 1°.
Figure 13 shows the configuration of the fabricated phase shifter composed of the 5cell CRLH transmission line with input and output circuits. The formed materials with ϵ _{ r } = 1.1 are employed for supporting each parallel plate capacitors of the CRLH transmission line and the slide region of the MIM capacitors. The simulated PSD of the unit cell used in this configuration is 10.1°. To cancel out the inductive reactance of the 5cell structure without the strip and tapered lines at the input and output sides in Figure 13, the parallel plate capacitors with l _{ pp } of 5 mm are inserted at the input and output sides of the CRLH transmission line. 50 Ω microstrip lines on the dielectric substrate with 8 mm length and 0.8 mm thickness are connected to both the input and output sides. The taper structures with 8 mm length are connected from microstrip line to the CRLH transmission line. The phase shifter is packaged by the blass case. The inner conductors of the coaxial cables are connected to the input and output microstrip lines.
Figure 14 shows the magnitude of Sparameter characteristics of the fabricated phase shifter. The simulated result is also plotted in Figure 14. The measured results well agree with the simulated results. The measured S _{11} and S _{21} of the fabricated phase shifter with the crossover of 100% become −6.7 dB and −2.0 dB at 1.5 GHz. Figure 15 shows the phase of S _{21} characteristics of the fabricated phase shifter and simulated one. Here, the phase shift is determined by the difference of the phases of S _{21} between the crossover of 10% and 100% and the PSD is the difference between the phase shift at 1.5 GHz and that at 2 GHz of the 5cell CRLH transmission line. The simulated phase shifts at 1.5 GHz and 2 GHz are 136.4° and 41.8°, and the measured phase shifts at 1.5 GHz and 2 GHz are 124.2° and 51.2°, respectively. The PSD of the 5cell CRLH transmission line is 94.6° in the simulation and 73.0° in the measurement. These values correspond to about 18.9° and 14.6° for the unit cell, respectively. Fabrication error should be a reason of the discrepancies between simulated and measured results. However, the measured results fairly agree with the simulated results and the large phase shift at lower frequency, which is required for the proposed phase shifter is verified through experiment. The measured PSD per unit cell of the 5cell structure is 6.3° larger than that of the unit cell described in Section 4. This should be due to the mutual coupling between the adjacent cells.
Fig. 13 Configuration of fabricated phase shifter composed of 5cell CRLH transmission line. (a) Top view of crossover of 10%. (b) Top view of crossover of 100%. (c) Side view. 
Fig. 14 Magnitude of Sparameters characteristics of 5cell transmission line. (a) Crossover of 10%. (b) Crossover of 100%. 
Fig. 15 Phase of S _{21} characteristics of 5cell transmission line. 
6 Conclusion
This paper presents a new phase shifter for multiband mobile base station antennas that can make deeper tilt in low frequency by using CRLH transmission line. The unit cell of the proposed CRLH transmission line is composed of a mushroom type structure. The series capacitance is realized by folding the top plates of the mushrooms along the transmission line. In addition, additional patches are placed above the gap between the adjacent unit cells. The additional patches can be mechanically shifted, then the phase characteristics can be varied.
To design the unit cell of the CRLH transmission line, circuit parameters that satisfy the electrical requirements are first investigated by using T shape 2port network. Then, the actual structure of the unit cell satisfying the derived circuit parameters is investigated by the finite element method analysis. Finally, a 5cell CRLH transmission line composed of the designed unit cells is fabricated and the inverse phase shift at two frequencies by using dispersion relation of CRLH transmission line is verified by the simulation and measurement. Large phase shift at lower frequency provides the reduction of the horizontal directivity in the base station antenna. As a result, the interference to neighboring cell at lower frequency can be suppressed. Realizing a phase shifter combining the proposed CRLH transmission line with conventional phase shifter, and miniaturization of the CRLH transmission line are future work.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 16K06365 and The Telecommunications Advancement Foundation.
References
 W.C.Y. Lee, Mobile communications engineering (McGrawHilee, 1982), pp. 5–9 [Google Scholar]
 Y. Yamada, Y. Ebine, K. Tsunekawa, Base and mobile station antennas for land mobile radio systems, IEICE Trans. Commun. E74 , 1547 (1991) [Google Scholar]
 M. Kijima, Y. Ebine, Y. Yamada, Development of a dualfrequency base station antenna for cellular mobile radios, IEICE Trans. Commun. E82B , 636 (1999) [Google Scholar]
 H. Arai, K. Cho, Cellular and PHS base station antenna systems, IEICE Trans. Commun. E86B , 980 (2003) [Google Scholar]
 N. Honma, F. Kira, T. Maruyama, K. Cho, H. Mizuno, Offset beam planar antenna employing low loss triangular dielectric phase shifter, IEICE Trans. Commun. E86B , 2720 (2003) [Google Scholar]
 R.B. Hwang, Y. Chang, M.I. Lai, A lowcost electrical beam tilting base station antennas for wireless communication system, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 52 , 115 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 C. Caloz, T. Itoh, Electromagnetic metamaterials: Transmission line theory and microwave applications (WileyIEEE Press, 2005) [Google Scholar]
 M.A. Antoniades, G.V. Eleftheriades, Compact linear lead/lag metamaterial phase shifters for broadband applications, IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2 , 103 (2003) [Google Scholar]
 H. Kim, A.B. Kozyrev, A. Karbassi, D.W. van der Weide, Linear tunable phase shifter using a lefthanded transmission line, IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 15 , 366 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 C. Damm, M. Schussler, M. Oertel, R. Jakoby, Compact tunable periodically LC loaded microstrip line for phase shifting applications, in International Microwave Symposium Digest. IEEE, 2003 (2005), pp. 2003–2006 [Google Scholar]
 P. He, P.V. Parimi, Y. He, V.G. Harris, C. Vittoria, Tunable negative refractive index metamaterial phase shifter, Electron. Lett. 43 , 1440 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 A. Grbic, G.V. Eleftheriades, A backwadwave antenna based on negative refractive index LC networks, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium. IEEE, 340 (2002) pp. 340–343 [Google Scholar]
 L. Liu, C. Caloz, T. Itoh, Dominant mode leakywave antenna with backfiretoendfire scanning capability, Electron. Lett. 38 , 1414 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 N. Michishita, H. Kitahara, Y. Yamada, K. Cho, Tunable phase shifter using composite right/lefthanded transmission line with mechanically variable MIM capacitors, IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 10 , 1579 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 N. Michishita, Y. Yamada, K. Cho, Achievement of inverse frequencydependent phase shift by using composite right/lefthanded phase shifter, Proc. Int. Symp. Antennas Propag. 4E14 , 1510 (2012) [Google Scholar]
 Y. Inoue, K. Cho, MIMO base station antenna employing mode selection in vertically split array, in 5th European Conference on Antennas Propagation (2011), pp. 2751–2755 [Google Scholar]
 S. Asaka, M. Karikomi, Y. Ebine, The structure and characteristics of a revolving variable phase shifter using slot couplings, Proc. Int. Symp. Antennas Propag. 1E23 , 305 (2000) [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: Naobumi Michishita, Yoshihide Yamaday, Keizo Choz, Design of composite right/lefthanded transmission line for phase shifter of multiband base station antenna, EPJ Appl. Metamat. 5, 12 (2018)
All Figures
Fig. 1 Configuration concept of base station antenna. (a) Subarray composed of 4 array elements. (b) Base station antenna with conventional phase shifter and (c) proposed conposite right/lefthanded phase shifter. 

In the text 
Fig. 2 Directivity difference between 1.5 and 2 GHz. 

In the text 
Fig. 3 Configuration of proposed phase shifter. 

In the text 
Fig. 4 Required maximum phase shift for 1.5 GHz to equalize the directivities toward vertical angle θ. 

In the text 
Fig. 5 Equivalent circuit model for the ideal CRLH transmission line. 

In the text 
Fig. 6 Phase shift difference between 1.5 and 2 GHz depending on C _{ L } and L _{ L }. 

In the text 
Fig. 7 Bloch impedance Z _{ B } at 1.5 GHz depending on C _{ L } and L _{ L }. 

In the text 
Fig. 8 Bloch impedance Z _{ B } at 2 GHz depending on C _{ L } and L _{ L }. 

In the text 
Fig. 9 Configuration of unit cell structure. 

In the text 
Fig. 10 Phase shift difference by subtracting phase shift between crossover of 10% and 100% at 2 GHz from that at 1.5 GHz when h and r are varied. 

In the text 
Fig. 11 Phase shift difference by subtracting phase shift between crossover of 10% and 100% at 2 GHz from that at 1.5 GHz when l _{ pp } and d are varied 

In the text 
Fig. 12 Dispersion diagram of the unit cell with l = 8 mm, g = 0.5 mm, p = 8.5 mm, w = 3 mm, r = 0.25 mm, h = 8 mm, l _{ pp } = 2.9 mm, d = 0.3 mm. 

In the text 
Fig. 13 Configuration of fabricated phase shifter composed of 5cell CRLH transmission line. (a) Top view of crossover of 10%. (b) Top view of crossover of 100%. (c) Side view. 

In the text 
Fig. 14 Magnitude of Sparameters characteristics of 5cell transmission line. (a) Crossover of 10%. (b) Crossover of 100%. 

In the text 
Fig. 15 Phase of S _{21} characteristics of 5cell transmission line. 

In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.